Display options
Cite
van der Heyden MA, van de Ven T, Opthof T. Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process. Neth Heart J. 2009;17(1):25-9doi: 10.1007/BF03086211.
van der Heyden, M. A., van de Ven, T., & Opthof, T. (2009). Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process. Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 17(1), 25-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03086211
van der Heyden, M A G, et al. "Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process." Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation vol. 17,1 (2009): 25-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03086211
van der Heyden MA, van de Ven T, Opthof T. Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process. Neth Heart J. 2009 Jan;17(1):25-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03086211. PMID: 19148335; PMCID: PMC2626656.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Neth Heart J. 2009 Jan;17(1):25-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03086211.

Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation

M A G van der Heyden, T van de Ven, T Opthof

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Physiology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

PMID: 19148335 PMCID: PMC2626656 DOI: 10.1007/BF03086211

Abstract

Scientific misconduct and fraud occur in science. The (anonymous) peer review process serves as goalkeeper of scientific quality rather than scientific integrity. In this brief paper we describe some limitations of the peer-review process. We describe the catastrophic facts of the 'Woo-Suk Hwang fraud case' and raise some ethical concerns about the issue. Finally, we pay attention to plagiarism, autoplagiarism and double publications. (Neth Heart J 2009;17:25-9.).

Keywords: double publications; fraud; peer review; plagiarism; scientific misconduct; stem cell research

References

  1. Nature. 2006 Mar 9;440(7081):E1-2 - PubMed
  2. Nature. 2005 Aug 4;436(7051):641 - PubMed
  3. Science. 2006 Mar 24;311(5768):1695 - PubMed
  4. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jul;47(7):821-2 - PubMed
  5. Nature. 2007 Aug 9;448(7154):633 - PubMed
  6. Cardiovasc Res. 2002 Dec;56(3):339-46 - PubMed
  7. Nature. 2007 Jun 21;447(7147):885 - PubMed
  8. Mol Reprod Dev. 2008 May;75(5):707-14 - PubMed
  9. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 Apr;125(4):534-41 - PubMed
  10. Anim Reprod Sci. 2007 Jul;100(1-2):107-17 - PubMed
  11. Science. 2006 Dec 1;314(5804):1353 - PubMed
  12. Chin Med J (Engl). 2004 Sep;117(9):1334-41 - PubMed
  13. J Clin Invest. 1994 May;93(5):1877-80 - PubMed
  14. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2006 Jan;34(1):14-8 - PubMed
  15. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008 Jun;106(1-2):13-24 - PubMed
  16. Rev Med Chil. 2007 Apr;135(4):415-8 - PubMed
  17. Science. 2006 Jan 20;311(5759):335 - PubMed
  18. Br J Surg. 2000 Dec;87(12):1605-9 - PubMed
  19. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Aug;34(8):519-23 - PubMed
  20. Theriogenology. 2006 Dec;66(9):2104-12 - PubMed
  21. JAMA. 2005 Jul 13;294(2):218-28 - PubMed
  22. Nature. 2006 Mar 9;440(7081):E2-3 - PubMed
  23. Nature. 2007 Aug 9;448(7154):632-3 - PubMed
  24. Science. 2005 Dec 9;310(5754):1595 - PubMed
  25. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Oct 6;348(4):1419-28 - PubMed
  26. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1323-9 - PubMed
  27. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Nov 28;86(44):3128-32 - PubMed
  28. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1321-2 - PubMed
  29. Neth Heart J. 2009 Jan;17(1):25-9 - PubMed
  30. Histol Histopathol. 2006 Aug;21(8):841-7 - PubMed
  31. Radiology. 1991 Mar;178(3):637-42 - PubMed
  32. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Apr;34(4):206-10 - PubMed
  33. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2004 Mar 7;42(5):296-301 - PubMed
  34. J Clin Invest. 1978 Jun;61(6):1697-701 - PubMed
  35. Cardiovasc Res. 2000 Jan 1;45(1):255-8 - PubMed
  36. Science. 2006 Jan 6;311(5757):22-5 - PubMed
  37. Science. 2005 Dec 16;310(5755):1748-9 - PubMed
  38. Cardiovasc Res. 2006 Jan;69(1):57-65 - PubMed
  39. Science. 2005 Dec 2;310(5753):1402-3 - PubMed
  40. Cardiovasc Res. 2006 Dec 1;72(3):483-93 - PubMed

Publication Types