Display options
Share it on

Epidemiol Infect. 2009 Aug;137(8):1062-72. doi: 10.1017/S0950268809002088. Epub 2009 Feb 12.

A comparative study of the 1918-1920 influenza pandemic in Japan, USA and UK: mortality impact and implications for pandemic planning.

Epidemiology and infection

S A Richard, N Sugaya, L Simonsen, M A Miller, C Viboud

Affiliations

  1. Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

PMID: 19215637 PMCID: PMC2704924 DOI: 10.1017/S0950268809002088

Abstract

Historical studies of influenza pandemics can provide insight into transmission and mortality patterns, and may aid in planning for a future pandemic. Here, we analyse historical vital statistics and quantify the age-specific mortality patterns associated with the 1918-1920 influenza pandemic in Japan, USA, and UK. All three countries showed highly elevated mortality risk in young adults relative to surrounding non-pandemic years. By contrast, the risk of death was low in the very young and very old. In Japan, the overall mortality impact was not limited to winter 1918-1919, and continued during winter 1919-1920. Mortality impact varied as much as threefold across the 47 Japanese prefectures, and differences in baseline mortality, population demographics, and density explained a small fraction of these variations. Our study highlights important geographical variations in timing and mortality impact of historical pandemics, in particular between the Eastern and Western hemispheres. In a future pandemic, vaccination in one region could save lives even months after the emergence of a pandemic virus in another region.

References

  1. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Feb 14;165(3):265-72 - PubMed
  2. J Infect Dis. 1998 Jul;178(1):53-60 - PubMed
  3. J Infect Dis. 2005 Jul 15;192(2):233-48 - PubMed
  4. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Oct 15;33(8):1375-8 - PubMed
  5. J Infect Dis. 2007 Apr 1;195(7):1018-28 - PubMed
  6. Med Hist. 2002 Jan;46(1):1-20 - PubMed
  7. Vaccine. 1999 Jul 30;17 Suppl 1:S3-10 - PubMed
  8. J Infect Dis. 2008 Jan 15;197(2):270-8 - PubMed
  9. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Apr;13(4):590-3 - PubMed
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7588-93 - PubMed
  11. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Jul;13(7):1052-7 - PubMed
  12. Am J Epidemiol. 1967 Sep;86(2):433-41 - PubMed
  13. Public Health Rep. 1951 Nov 16;66(46):1487-1516 - PubMed
  14. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Mar 7;275(1634):501-9 - PubMed
  15. J Infect Dis. 2008 Nov 15;198(10):1427-34 - PubMed
  16. Lancet. 2006 Dec 23;368(9554):2211-8 - PubMed
  17. Bull Hist Med. 1991 Spring;65(1):4-21 - PubMed
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 2;102(31):11059-63 - PubMed
  19. Int J Infect Dis. 2007 Jul;11(4):360-4 - PubMed
  20. JAMA. 2003 Jan 8;289(2):179-86 - PubMed
  21. Bull Hist Med. 2002 Spring;76(1):105-15 - PubMed
  22. Bull Hist Med. 1992 Winter;66(4):560-77 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support