J Carcinog. 2007 Sep 26;6:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-3163-6-15.
Distinct evolutionary mechanisms for genomic imbalances in high-risk and low-risk neuroblastomas.
Journal of carcinogenesis
David Gisselsson, Gisela Lundberg, Ingrid Ora, Mattias Höglund
PMID: 17897457
PMCID: PMC2042979 DOI: 10.1186/1477-3163-6-15
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid tumour of childhood. Several genomic imbalances correlate to prognosis in NB, with structural rearrangements, including gene amplification, in a near-diploid setting typically signifying high-risk tumours and numerical changes in a near-triploid setting signifying low-risk tumours. Little is known about the temporal sequence in which these imbalances occur during the carcinogenic process.
METHODS: We have reconstructed the appearance of cytogenetic imbalances in 270 NBs by first grouping tumours and imbalances through principal component analysis and then using the number of imbalances in each tumour as an indicator of evolutionary progression.
RESULTS: Tumours clustered in four sub-groups, dominated respectively by (1) gene amplification in double minute chromosomes and few other aberrations, (2) gene amplification and loss of 1p sequences, (3) loss of 1p and other structural aberrations including gain of 17q, and (4) whole-chromosome gains and losses. Temporal analysis showed that the structural changes in groups 1-3 were acquired in a step-wise fashion, with loss of 1p sequences and the emergence of double minute chromosomes as the earliest cytogenetic events. In contrast, the gains and losses of whole chromosomes in group 4 occurred through multiple simultaneous events leading to a near-triploid chromosome number.
CONCLUSION: The finding of different temporal patterns for the acquisition of genomic imbalances in high-risk and low-risk NBs lends strong support to the hypothesis that these tumours are biologically diverse entities, evolving through distinct genetic mechanisms.
References
- N Engl J Med. 1999 Jun 24;340(25):1954-61 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 1993 Aug;11(8):1466-77 - PubMed
- Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000 Oct;29(2):89-95 - PubMed
- Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2001 Jun;31(2):156-71 - PubMed
- Ann Genet. 2001 Jul-Sep;44(3):161-6 - PubMed
- Cancer Res. 2002 May 1;62(9):2675-80 - PubMed
- Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2002 Jul;34(3):313-24 - PubMed
- Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2002 Jun;135(2):103-9 - PubMed
- Cancer Res. 2002 Oct 15;62(20):5939-46 - PubMed
- Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 Mar;3(3):203-16 - PubMed
- Cancer Res. 2003 Jun 15;63(12):3378-85 - PubMed
- Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2004 Apr 1;150(1):9-15 - PubMed
- Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Feb;44(2):147-57 - PubMed
- Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005 Apr;42(4):327-41 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 1;23(10):2280-99 - PubMed
- Int J Cancer. 2005 Sep 1;116(3):401-6 - PubMed
- Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005 Oct;44(2):113-22 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 24;353(21):2243-53 - PubMed
- Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2006 May;167(1):51-6 - PubMed
- Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2006 Dec;45(12):1130-42 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Dec;41(12):2032-6 - PubMed
- PLoS One. 2007;2(2):e255 - PubMed
- Cancer. 1989 Jan 1;63(1):126-32 - PubMed
- J Pediatr. 1988 Apr;112(4):567-71 - PubMed
- Cancer Res. 1987 Jan 1;47(1):311-8 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 1985 Oct 31;313(18):1111-6 - PubMed
- Eur J Cancer. 2000 May;36(7):901-8 - PubMed
Publication Types