J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jan;91(1):9-24. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.9.

Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance.

The Journal of applied psychology

Eric D Heggestad, Morgan Morrison, Charlie L Reeve, Rodney A McCloy

PMID: 16435935 DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.9

Abstract

Recent research suggests multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) response formats may provide resistance to purposeful response distortion on personality assessments. It remains unclear, however, whether these formats provide normative trait information required for selection contexts. The current research evaluated score correspondences between an MFC format measure and 2 Likert-type measures in honest and instructed-faking conditions. In honest response conditions, scores from the MFC measure appeared valid indicators of normative trait standing. Under faking conditions, the MFC measure showed less score inflation than the Likert measure at the group level of analysis. In the individual-level analyses, however, the MFC measure was as affected by faking as was the Likert measure. Results suggest the MFC format is not a viable method to control faking.

(c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

MeSH terms

• Humans
• Personality*
• Personality Assessment*
• Reproducibility of Results

Publication Types

• Journal Article
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
• Validation Study