Display options
Share it on

Dev Sci. 2003 Jun;6(3):346-59. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00289.

The influence of language on theory of mind: a training study.

Developmental science

Courtney Melinda Hale, Helen Tager-Flusberg

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA.

PMID: 16467908 PMCID: PMC1350918 DOI: 10.1111/1467-7687.00289

Abstract

This study investigated the role of language in the development of theory of mind. It was hypothesized that the acquisition of the syntactic and semantic properties of sentential complements would facilitate the development of a representational theory of mind. Sixty preschoolers who failed false belief and sentential complement pretests were randomly assigned to training on false belief, sentential complements, or relative clauses (as a control group). All the children were post-tested on a set of different theory of mind tasks, sentential complements and relative clauses. The main findings were that the group trained on sentential complements not only acquired the linguistic knowledge fostered by the training, but also significantly increased their scores on a range of theory of mind tasks. In contrast, false belief training only led to improved theory of mind scores but had no influence on language. The control group, trained on relative clauses, showed no improvement on theory of mind posttests. These findings are taken as evidence that the acquisition of sentential complements contributes to the development of theory of mind in preschoolers.

References

  1. Child Dev. 1999 Jul-Aug;70(4):853-65 - PubMed
  2. Dev Psychol. 1999 Sep;35(5):1311-20 - PubMed
  3. Child Dev. 1998 Jun;69(3):672-91 - PubMed
  4. Cognition. 1998 Apr;66(1):1-31 - PubMed
  5. Child Dev. 1998 Apr;69(2):321-32 - PubMed
  6. Dev Psychol. 1998 Mar;34(2):332-41 - PubMed
  7. Child Dev. 1996 Dec;67(6):2967-88 - PubMed
  8. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1995 Mar;36(3):459-74 - PubMed
  9. Cognition. 1995 Jul;56(1):31-60 - PubMed
  10. Cogn Psychol. 1983 Jan;15(1):95-120 - PubMed
  11. Cognition. 1983 Jan;13(1):103-28 - PubMed
  12. Am Psychol. 1986 Apr;41(4):418-25 - PubMed
  13. Child Dev. 1988 Feb;59(1):26-37 - PubMed
  14. Cognition. 1990 Apr;35(1):41-68 - PubMed
  15. Cognition. 1991 Jan;38(1):1-12 - PubMed
  16. Cognition. 1991 May;39(2):107-27 - PubMed
  17. Cognition. 1992 Sep;44(3):283-96 - PubMed
  18. Child Dev. 2001 Jul-Aug;72(4):1032-53 - PubMed
  19. Cognition. 2000 Oct 16;77(1):B25-31 - PubMed
  20. Child Dev. 2001 May-Jun;72(3):655-84 - PubMed
  21. Child Dev. 2001 May-Jun;72(3):688-90 - PubMed
  22. Child Dev. 2001 May-Jun;72(3):696-701 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support