Display options
Cite
Doull J. Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency's definition of risk assessment. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2006;25(1):44-5doi: 10.1191/0960327106ht583oa.
Doull, J. (2006). Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency's definition of risk assessment. Human & experimental toxicology, 25(1), 44-5. https://doi.org/10.1191/0960327106ht583oa
Doull, J. "Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency's definition of risk assessment." Human & experimental toxicology vol. 25,1 (2006): 44-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/0960327106ht583oa
Doull J. Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency's definition of risk assessment. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2006 Jan;25(1):44-5. doi: 10.1191/0960327106ht583oa. PMID: 16459713.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Hum Exp Toxicol. 2006 Jan;25(1):44-5. doi: 10.1191/0960327106ht583oa.

Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency's definition of risk assessment.

Human & experimental toxicology

J Doull

Affiliations

  1. University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

PMID: 16459713 DOI: 10.1191/0960327106ht583oa

Abstract

Common sense requires that regulation to prevent the adverse effects of exposure to chemicals should when possible preserve the desirable or beneficial effects of exposure to the chemical. Excluding such effects by definition is contrary to good science and common sense.

MeSH terms

Publication Types