Display options
Share it on

BMC Res Notes. 2009 Mar 07;2:38. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-38.

A Tn5051-like mer-containing transposon identified in a heavy metal tolerant strain Achromobacter sp. AO22.

BMC research notes

Shee Ping Ng, Belinda Davis, Enzo A Palombo, Mrinal Bhave

Affiliations

  1. Environment and Biotechnology Centre, Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, PO Box 218, Melbourne, Victoria 3122, Australia. [email protected]

PMID: 19284535 PMCID: PMC2663772 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-38

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Achromobacter sp. AO22 (formerly Alcaligenes sp. AO22), a bacterial strain isolated from a lead-contaminated industrial site in Australia, was previously found to be resistant to moderate to high levels of mercury, copper and other heavy metals. However, the nature and location of the genetic basis for mercuric ion resistance in this strain, had not been previously identified.

FINDINGS: Achromobacter sp. AO22 contains a functional mer operon with all four essential genes (merRTPA) and shows >99% DNA sequence identity to that of Tn501. The mer operon was present on a transposon, designated TnAO22, captured by introducing a broad-host-range IncP plasmid into Achromobacter sp. AO22 and subsequently transferring it to E. coli recipients. The transposition frequency of TnAO22 was 10-2 to 10-3 per target plasmid transferred. Analysis of TnAO22 sequence revealed it belonged to the Tn21 subgroup of the Tn3 superfamily of transposons, with the transposition module having >99% identity with Tn5051 of a Pseudomonas putida strain isolated from a water sample in New York.

CONCLUSION: TnAO22 is thus a new variant of Tn5051 of the Tn3 superfamily and the transposon and its associated mercury resistance system are among the few such systems reported in a soil bacterium. Achromobacter sp. AO22 can thus be exploited for applications such as in situ mercury bioremediation of contaminated sites, or the mobile unit and mer operon could be mobilized to other bacteria for similar purposes.

References

  1. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Sep;44(9):3415-7 - PubMed
  2. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003 Jun;27(2-3):355-84 - PubMed
  3. Biodegradation. 1997;8(2):113-24 - PubMed
  4. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003 Sep 26;226(2):251-5 - PubMed
  5. Microbiology (Reading). 1997 Aug;143 ( Pt 8):2549-2556 - PubMed
  6. J Bacteriol. 1981 Mar;145(3):1365-73 - PubMed
  7. Plasmid. 1989 Jul;22(1):59-69 - PubMed
  8. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1984 Nov;26(11):1330-3 - PubMed
  9. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Mar;47(3):1115-9 - PubMed
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Oct;82(19):6414-8 - PubMed
  11. Gene. 1999 Jul 8;234(2):361-9 - PubMed
  12. Plasmid. 1990 Nov;24(3):163-89 - PubMed
  13. J Bacteriol. 1991 Jan;173(2):697-703 - PubMed
  14. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001 Sep 11;203(1):11-21 - PubMed
  15. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1960 Dec;3:654-9 - PubMed
  16. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999 Sep;63(3):507-22 - PubMed
  17. Res Microbiol. 2001 Jun;152(5):503-14 - PubMed
  18. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000 Dec 1;193(1):123-7 - PubMed
  19. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003 Aug;62(2-3):124-33 - PubMed
  20. Environ Pollut. 2004 Sep;131(2):255-62 - PubMed
  21. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003 Jun;27(2-3):385-410 - PubMed
  22. Res Microbiol. 2001 Nov;152(9):811-22 - PubMed
  23. J Gen Microbiol. 1989 Mar;135(3):499-502 - PubMed
  24. Gene. 1986;42(1):37-48 - PubMed
  25. J Bacteriol. 1977 Mar;129(3):1227-33 - PubMed
  26. Res Microbiol. 2000 May;151(4):291-302 - PubMed
  27. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Jan;66(1):290-6 - PubMed

Publication Types