Display options
Cite
Waldman GL, Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J. Microleakage and Resin-to-Dentin Interface Morphology of Pre-Etching versus Self-Etching Adhesive Systems. Open Dent J. 2008;2:120-5doi: 10.2174/1874210600802010120.
Waldman, G. L., Vaidyanathan, T. K., & Vaidyanathan, J. (2008). Microleakage and Resin-to-Dentin Interface Morphology of Pre-Etching versus Self-Etching Adhesive Systems. The open dentistry journal, 2120-5. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210600802010120
Waldman, G L, et al. "Microleakage and Resin-to-Dentin Interface Morphology of Pre-Etching versus Self-Etching Adhesive Systems." The open dentistry journal vol. 2 (2008): 120-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210600802010120
Waldman GL, Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J. Microleakage and Resin-to-Dentin Interface Morphology of Pre-Etching versus Self-Etching Adhesive Systems. Open Dent J. 2008 Nov 28;2:120-5. doi: 10.2174/1874210600802010120. PMID: 19444319; PMCID: PMC2606661.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Open Dent J. 2008 Nov 28;2:120-5. doi: 10.2174/1874210600802010120.

Microleakage and Resin-to-Dentin Interface Morphology of Pre-Etching versus Self-Etching Adhesive Systems.

The open dentistry journal

G L Waldman, T K Vaidyanathan, J Vaidyanathan

Affiliations

  1. NJ Dental School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.

PMID: 19444319 PMCID: PMC2606661 DOI: 10.2174/1874210600802010120

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the microleakage and tissue-adhesive interface morphology from Class V restorations using different systems of dentin adhesives. Class V cavities were prepared on buccal surfaces of 27 extracted caries-free molars and premolars. Teeth were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) Prime & Bond NT, a 5(th) generation system using an initial step of total etch followed by a second step of application of a self bonding primer (2) Clearfil SE Bond, a 5(th) generation adhesive system employing two separate steps of self-etch priming and subsequent bonding (3) One-up Bond F, a 6(th) generation one step self-etching, self-priming and self-bonding adhesive. Microleakage and interface morphology of teeth restored with these adhesives and a composite resin were evaluated. Kruskal-Wallis Test (p = 0.05) was used to analyze the results. SEM analysis was used to relate interface morphology to microleakage. The mean and (SD) values of microleakage were: Prime and Bond NT: 0.15 (0.33), Clearfil SE Bond: 0.06 (0.17) and One-up Bond F: 2.96 (0.63). The mean microleakage for One-up Bond was significantly higher than for the other groups (p<0.05). Protruding tags in dentin channels were observed in Prime and Bond and Clearfil systems, but not in One-up Bond. The single step adhesive system, although more convenient for the clinician, uses a low viscosity formulation difficult to keep in place on cavity walls. It also tends to be too aggressive and hydrophilic to create an impermeable hybridized tissue-adhesive interfacial layer resistant to microleakage. Two-step adhesive systems, on the other hand, were retained on all segments of the cavosurface during application, and formed a hybridized interfacial layer resistant to microleakage.

References

  1. Am J Dent. 1997 Apr;10(2):66-70 - PubMed
  2. Arch Oral Biol. 1988;33(4):265-70 - PubMed
  3. J Dent Res. 1999 Apr;78(4):906-11 - PubMed
  4. J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Sep;25(9):666-71 - PubMed
  5. Biomaterials. 2001 Nov;22(21):2911-20 - PubMed
  6. Am J Dent. 1998 Aug;11(4):160-4 - PubMed
  7. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Feb;83(2):194-203 - PubMed
  8. Am J Dent. 1993 Dec;6(6):295-8 - PubMed
  9. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Jun;131 Suppl:20S-25S - PubMed
  10. Dent Mater. 2001 Jul;17(4):296-308 - PubMed
  11. Prim Dent Care. 2006 Jul;13(3):107-11 - PubMed
  12. J Dent Res. 1994 Jun;73(6):1212-20 - PubMed
  13. Oper Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):60-7 - PubMed
  14. J Dent Res. 1994 May;73(5):1088-95 - PubMed
  15. Oper Dent. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(4):450-5 - PubMed
  16. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;69(11):726-31 - PubMed
  17. Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):292-8 - PubMed
  18. Dent Mater. 1998 Mar;14(2):99-105 - PubMed
  19. Am J Dent. 1999 Dec;12(6):291-4 - PubMed
  20. J Dent Res. 1996 Sep;75(9):1706-15 - PubMed
  21. Pediatr Dent. 2001 Jul-Aug;23(4):315-20 - PubMed
  22. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Nov 01;7(5):26-33 - PubMed
  23. J Dent Res. 1955 Dec;34(6):849-53 - PubMed
  24. J Dent Res. 2004 Jun;83(6):454-8 - PubMed
  25. Dent Mater. 1992 Mar;8(2):125-30 - PubMed
  26. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002 Feb;133(2):229-31 - PubMed
  27. Oper Dent. 2002 Nov-Dec;27(6):582-6 - PubMed
  28. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Oct;72(4):420-3 - PubMed
  29. Oper Dent. 1992;Suppl 5:62-7 - PubMed
  30. J Dent Res. 1993 Feb;72(2):495-501 - PubMed
  31. Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):163-9 - PubMed
  32. Dent Mater. 1996 Sep;12(5):302-7 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support