Display options
Share it on

J Child Orthop. 2009 Jun;3(3):191-7. doi: 10.1007/s11832-009-0167-8. Epub 2009 Mar 17.

Classification of proximal tibial fractures in children.

Journal of children's orthopaedics

Scott J Mubarak, Jung Ryul Kim, Eric W Edmonds, Maya E Pring, Tracey P Bastrom

Affiliations

  1. Pediatric Orthopedics and Scoliosis Division, Rady Children's Hospital and Health Center, 3030 Children's Way, Suite 410, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA, [email protected].

PMID: 19308478 PMCID: PMC2686808 DOI: 10.1007/s11832-009-0167-8

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a classification system for all proximal tibial fractures in children that accounts for force of injury and fracture patterns.

METHODS: At our institution, 135 pediatric proximal tibia fractures were treated from 1997 to 2005. Fractures were classified into four groups according to the direction of force of injury: valgus, varus, extension, and flexion-avulsion. Each group was subdivided into metaphyseal and physeal type by fracture location and Salter-Harris classification. Also included were tibial tuberosity and tibial spine fractures.

RESULTS: Of the 135 fractures, 30 (22.2%) were classified as flexion group, 60 (44.4%) extension group, 28 (20.8%) valgus group, and 17 (12.6%) varus group. The most common type was extension-epiphyseal-intra-articular-tibial spine in 52 fractures (38.5%). This study shows that proximal tibial fractures are age-dependent in relation to: mechanism, location, and Salter-Harris type. In prepubescent children (ages 4-9 years), varus and valgus forces were the predominate mechanism of fracture creation. During the years nearing adolescence (around ages 10-12 years), a fracture mechanism involving extension forces predominated. With pubescence (after age 13 years), the flexion-avulsion pattern is most commonly seen. Furthermore, metaphyseal fractures predominated in the youngest population (ages 3-6 years), with tibial spine fractures occurring at age 10, Salter-Harris type I and II fractures at age 12, and Salter-Harris type III and IV physeal injuries occurring around age 14 years.

CONCLUSION: We propose a new classification scheme that reflects both the direction of force and fracture pattern that appears to be age-dependent. A better understanding of injury patterns based on the age of the child, in conjunction with appropriate pre-operative imaging studies, such as computer-aided tomography, will facilitate the operative treatment of these often complex fractures.

References

  1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 Apr;(194):181-4 - PubMed
  2. J Pediatr Orthop. 1983 May;3(2):235-7 - PubMed
  3. Br J Sports Med. 1991 Mar;25(1):52-6 - PubMed
  4. Am J Sports Med. 2003 May-Jun;31(3):404-7 - PubMed
  5. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1977 Aug;59(3):290-2 - PubMed
  6. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Dec;59(8):1111-4 - PubMed
  7. J Pediatr Orthop. 1984 Sep;4(5):538-41 - PubMed
  8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Aug;(389):191-5 - PubMed
  9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Oct;(295):201-4 - PubMed
  10. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2003 Sep;32(9):452-4 - PubMed
  11. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971 Dec;53(8):1571-8 - PubMed
  12. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991;110(6):301-6 - PubMed
  13. J Pediatr Orthop. 1987 Jul-Aug;7(4):458-62 - PubMed
  14. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950 Oct;32 A(4):721-38 - PubMed
  15. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Aug;(209):161-5 - PubMed
  16. J Pediatr Orthop. 1984 Aug;4(4):465-8 - PubMed
  17. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Mar;62(2):205-15 - PubMed
  18. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979 Mar;61(2):167-73 - PubMed
  19. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2003 Dec;32(12):604-7 - PubMed
  20. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959 Mar;41-A(2):209-20; discussion 220-2 - PubMed
  21. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Mar;70(2):228-30 - PubMed

Publication Types