Display options
Share it on

Psychosoc Med. 2007 Dec 07;4:Doc13.

Living with a partner and health care use - results from the MONICA survey Augsburg in Southern Germany.

Psycho-social medicine

Carola A Huber, Sebastian E Baumeister, Karl-Heinz Ladwig, Andreas Mielck

Affiliations

  1. Departement Gesundheit, Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Winterthur, Switzerland.

PMID: 19742289 PMCID: PMC2736524

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have shown that social relationships are associated with health care use. This study aims to test if and to which extent a proximal element of social relationships, particularly living together with a partner, influences the health care utilisation in the same way as a distal element such as group membership.

METHODS: On the basis of a representative random sample of a southern German population (4856 participants), the associations were assessed between the following groups of variables: number of consultations with the general practitioner or internists, type of social relationships (living with a partner, friends, relatives, group memberships), need (evaluated and perceived health status), socio-demographic variables.

RESULTS: All analyses showed associations between living with a partner and health care utilisation. Individuals living with a partner had lower levels of utilisation than individuals not living with a partner (mean: 4.3 vs. 5.2). These associations persisted after controlling for socio-demographic and need variables. For the other indicators of social relationships, though, there were no significant associations with outpatient visits.

CONCLUSIONS: Distinguishing between different types of social relationships is important for disentangling the overall effects of social relationships on health care utilisation. Also, the empirical findings confirm that health care research should not be restricted to medical variables, but should also include psycho-social factors.

Keywords: health care utilisation; social networks; social relationships

References

  1. Science. 1988 Jul 29;241(4865):540-5 - PubMed
  2. J Health Soc Behav. 1997 Mar;38(1):21-37 - PubMed
  3. Med Care. 1998 Jul;36(7):1057-72 - PubMed
  4. Med Care. 1999 Sep;37(9):858-73 - PubMed
  5. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Jun;8(2):95-106 - PubMed
  6. Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Feb;109(2):186-204 - PubMed
  7. Eur Heart J. 1998 Aug;19(8):1197-207 - PubMed
  8. Soc Sci Med. 2003 Dec;57(11):2137-47 - PubMed
  9. J Health Soc Behav. 1987 Sep;28(3):306-19 - PubMed
  10. Gesundheitswesen. 2004 Mar;66(3):175-9 - PubMed
  11. J Health Soc Behav. 1979 Dec;20(4):387-96 - PubMed
  12. Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(10):1121-7 - PubMed
  13. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2002 Oct;35(5):441-9 - PubMed
  14. Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20:125-44 - PubMed
  15. J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1-10 - PubMed
  16. Public Health Rep. 1984 Jul-Aug;99(4):415-24 - PubMed
  17. Am Psychol. 2004 Nov;59(8):676-684 - PubMed
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Nov;55(9):1635-46 - PubMed
  19. Soc Work Health Care. 2001;33(2):67-87 - PubMed

Publication Types