Display options
Share it on

Adv Urol. 2009;231861. doi: 10.1155/2009/231861. Epub 2009 Jul 20.

Bladder tumor in women with microscopic hematuria: an Iranian experience and a review of the literature.

Advances in urology

Shahin Abbaszadeh, Saeed Taheri, Mohammad Hossein Nourbala

Affiliations

  1. Dr. Taheri Medical Research Group, Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver diseases, Baqiyatallah Hospital, Mullasadra Ave, Tehran 1435915371, Iran.

PMID: 19639044 PMCID: PMC2715568 DOI: 10.1155/2009/231861

Abstract

AIM: In this study we report our experience with microhematuria and its relation with bladder tumors in Iranian women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall 249 women were evaluated. Microscopic hematuria was defined as three or more red blood cells per high-power field on at least two different occasions. Patients with a history of gross hematuria or coagulation disorders, having organic diseases, urinary stones, urinary tract infections, nephrological diseases, and local lesions such as urethral caruncle were excluded from the study population. Final diagnosis of malignant tumors was done with cystoscopy and biopsy specimen pathological assessment in all cases.

RESULTS: Age for the study population was 49.7 +/- 11.8 years. 95 (38%) of patients were identified during routine check up and presenting symptoms in other patients were frequency, dysuria, stress urge incontinence, urge incontinence, feeling of incomplete urine emptying, and flunk pain, respectively. Finally, 7 (2.8%) of study subjects were confirmed as having bladder tumors. One of tumor cases was diagnosed 24 months after initial assessments. Patients with bladder tumor were significantly older; more frequently had diverticulum in their bladder wall (P < .05).

CONCLUSION: Female microscopic hematuria is relevant and deserves evaluations, especially in elderly patients. Patients whose reason for microhematuria would not be diagnosed at the initial evaluations should be followed.

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 5;348(23):2330-8 - PubMed
  2. J Urol. 1990 Jul;144(1):99-101 - PubMed
  3. Urology. 2001 May;57(5):889-94 - PubMed
  4. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2001 Dec;35(6):497-501 - PubMed
  5. J Urol. 1987 Nov;138(5):1189-90 - PubMed
  6. Urology. 1995 Oct;46(4):484-9 - PubMed
  7. BMJ. 2003 Apr 12;326(7393):813-5 - PubMed
  8. Cleve Clin J Med. 2007 May;74 Suppl 3:S6-14 - PubMed
  9. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994 Jul-Aug;3(5):439-43 - PubMed
  10. QJM. 2004 Nov;97(11):739-45 - PubMed
  11. J Urol. 1995 Jul;154(1):57-61 - PubMed
  12. BJU Int. 2002 Sep;90(4):355-7 - PubMed
  13. JAMA. 1989 Sep 1;262(9):1214-9 - PubMed
  14. J Urol. 1988 May;139(5):1002-6 - PubMed
  15. Urology. 1986 Dec;28(6):453-5 - PubMed
  16. Am Fam Physician. 2001 Mar 15;63(6):1145-54 - PubMed
  17. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001 Aug;19(3):621-32 - PubMed
  18. Arch Intern Med. 1988 Dec;148(12):2629-32 - PubMed
  19. Am Fam Physician. 2000 May 1;61(9):2611 - PubMed
  20. JAMA. 1986 Jul 11;256(2):224-9 - PubMed
  21. J Urol. 1980 Sep;124(3):389-91 - PubMed
  22. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2000 Dec;26(3):92-5 - PubMed
  23. J Urol. 2000 Feb;163(2):524-7 - PubMed
  24. JAMA. 1990 May 9;263(18):2475-80 - PubMed

Publication Types