Display options
Share it on

J Biol Phys. 2008 Apr;34(1):149-61. doi: 10.1007/s10867-008-9110-3. Epub 2008 Sep 12.

Looking for robust properties in the growth of an academic network: the case of the Uruguayan biological research community.

Journal of biological physics

Alvaro Cabana, Eduardo Mizraji, Andrés Pomi, Juan Carlos Valle-Lisboa

Affiliations

  1. Group of Cognitive Systems Modeling Sección Biofísica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay.

PMID: 19669499 PMCID: PMC2577745 DOI: 10.1007/s10867-008-9110-3

Abstract

Graph-theoretical methods have recently been used to analyze certain properties of natural and social networks. In this work, we have investigated the early stages in the growth of a Uruguayan academic network, the Biology Area of the Programme for the Development of Basic Science (PEDECIBA). This transparent social network is a territory for the exploration of the reliability of clustering methods that can potentially be used when we are confronted with opaque natural systems that provide us with a limited spectrum of observables (happens in research on the relations between brain, thought and language). From our social net, we constructed two different graph representations based on the relationships among researchers revealed by their co-participation in Master's thesis committees. We studied these networks at different times and found that they achieve connectedness early in their evolution and exhibit the small-world property (i.e. high clustering with short path lengths). The data seem compatible with power law distributions of connectivity, clustering coefficients and betweenness centrality. Evidence of preferential attachment of new nodes and of new links between old nodes was also found in both representations. These results suggest that there are topological properties observed throughout the growth of the network that do not depend on the representations we have chosen but reflect intrinsic properties of the academic collective under study. Researchers in PEDECIBA are classified according to their specialties. We analysed the community structure detected by a standard algorithm in both representations. We found that much of the pre-specified structure is recovered and part of the mismatches can be attributed to convergent interests between scientists from different sub-disciplines. This result shows the potentiality of some clustering methods for the analysis of partially known natural systems.

References

  1. Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2 - PubMed
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 11;99(12):7821-6 - PubMed
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 2;101(9):2658-63 - PubMed
  4. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Sep;76(3 Pt 2):036102 - PubMed
  5. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Dec;76(6 Pt 2):066102 - PubMed
  6. Science. 2002 Aug 30;297(5586):1551-5 - PubMed
  7. Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):509-12 - PubMed
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 10;97(21):11149-52 - PubMed
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Feb 19;99 Suppl 1:2566-72 - PubMed
  10. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001 Jul;64(1 Pt 2):016132 - PubMed
  11. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001 Jul;64(1 Pt 2):016131 - PubMed
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8577-82 - PubMed

Publication Types