Display options
Share it on

Commun Integr Biol. 2009;2(1):1-3. doi: 10.4161/cib.2.1.7297.

Detecting changes in real-world objects: The relationship between visual long-term memory and change blindness.

Communicative & integrative biology

Timothy F Brady, Talia Konkle, Aude Oliva, George A Alvarez

Affiliations

  1. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Cambridge, Massachusetts USA.

PMID: 19704852 PMCID: PMC2649286 DOI: 10.4161/cib.2.1.7297

Abstract

A large body of literature has shown that observers often fail to notice significant changes in visual scenes, even when these changes happen right in front of their eyes. For instance, people often fail to notice if their conversation partner is switched to another person, or if large background objects suddenly disappear.1,2 These 'change blindness' studies have led to the inference that the amount of information we remember about each item in a visual scene may be quite low.1 However, in recent work we have demonstrated that long-term memory is capable of storing a massive number of visual objects with significant detail about each item.3 In the present paper we attempt to reconcile these findings by demonstrating that observers do not experience 'change blindness' with the real world objects used in our previous experiment if they are given sufficient time to encode each item. The results reported here suggest that one of the major causes of change blindness for real-world objects is a lack of encoding time or attention to each object (see also refs. 4 and 5).

Keywords: change blindness; change detection; fidelity; gist; object recognition

References

  1. Q J Exp Psychol. 1973 May;25(2):207-22 - PubMed
  2. Trends Cogn Sci. 1997 Oct;1(7):261-7 - PubMed
  3. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Jun;30(3):519-37 - PubMed
  4. Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81 - PubMed
  5. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85 - PubMed
  6. Can J Psychol. 1992 Sep;46(3):461-88 - PubMed
  7. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Jan;9(1):16-20 - PubMed
  8. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):939-73; discussion 973-1031 - PubMed
  9. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):622-8 - PubMed
  10. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Nov;138(4):487-502 - PubMed
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 23;105(38):14325-9 - PubMed
  12. Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):106-11 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support