Display options
Share it on

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009 Nov 03;3:131-43. doi: 10.2147/ppa.s3692.

Safety, efficacy and patient satisfaction with continuous daily administration of levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol oral contraceptives.

Patient preference and adherence

Giuseppe Benagiano, Sabina Carrara, Valentina Filippi

Affiliations

  1. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

PMID: 19936155 PMCID: PMC2778424 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s3692

Abstract

The progestational steroid norgestrel was synthesized and tested between 1960 and 1965 through an international cooperation between Wyeth, USA and Schering, Berlin. It is a mixture of two "enantiomers," with only one form (designated as levonorgestrel) biologically active. When taken orally, it is rapidly absorbed, not subjected to a "first-pass" effect and is approximately 90% bioavailable, with a circulating half-life around 15 hours. Its contraceptive action is exerted at the central (hypothalamic) and peripheral (cervical mucus and endometrium) levels. Levonorgestrel (LNG), alone or in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE), is the most widely employed contraceptive progestin: it is used in combined oral contraceptives, progestogen-only pills, long-acting contraceptive implants, intrauterine contraceptive systems and in emergency contraception. It is also the steroid of choice for new oral contraceptive regimens aimed at reducing the frequency of bleeding episodes. This novel approach, already tried more than 30 years ago, gained interest around the year 2000 when surveys of women's attitudes toward monthly menstrual bleeding started to show a major change: more and more women declared that they would welcome a hormonal contraceptive method that reduced bleeding episodes to 4, 2 or even 1 per year. At this point, while the debate on the significance and "usefulness" of menstruation went on, attention focused on new regimens. The first new modality consisted of changing the 7-day medication-free interval, either shortening it to fewer than 7 days, or by the administration of low-dose estrogens during the interval between packages. Then, continuous administration regimens started to be investigated. This, however, did not happen suddenly, since, in specific situations, doctors had for years empirically utilized various continuous administration regimens. The first extended-cycle oral contraceptive regimen introduced in clinical practice is an 84-day regimen that results in bleeding only 4 times a year. A commercial product specifically packed for continuous use is now available in Europe and contains 30 mug EE and 150 mug LNG. In a variation of this regimen, after administration of the same combination for 84 days, women are given 7 pills containing 10 mug EE. A 6-monthly regimen has also been tested in a small study using EE 20 mug plus LNG 100 mug taken with and without a hormone-free interval. Women in the continuous group reported significantly fewer bleeding days requiring protection and were more likely to have amenorrhea; in addition they also reported significantly fewer days of bloating and menstrual pain. A yearly regimen is now being developed. Each pill of this novel formulation contains EE 20 mug and LNG 90 mug to be taken continuously for 364 days (13 cycles) per year. A phase III trial has now evaluated safety, efficacy and menses inhibition. At the end of the 1-year trial amenorrhea was present in 58.7% of the women and a complete absence of bleeding in 79.0%. Overall, the number of bleeding and spotting days per pill pack declined with time and adverse events and discontinuations were comparable to those reported for cyclic oral contraceptive regimens.

Keywords: amenorrhea; continuous administration; levonorgestrel; menstruation; oral contraceptive

References

  1. Science. 1956 Nov 2;124(3227):891-3 - PubMed
  2. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Apr;22(2):355-74 - PubMed
  3. Contraception. 2000 Dec;62(6):277-84 - PubMed
  4. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2004 Sep;9(3):182-93 - PubMed
  5. Fertil Steril. 2002 Jan;77(1):52-61 - PubMed
  6. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Aug;3(4):585-90 - PubMed
  7. Contraception. 2003 Jan;67(1):9-13 - PubMed
  8. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008 Jun;63(6):395-402; quiz 405 - PubMed
  9. Hum Reprod Update. 2006 Mar-Apr;12(2):169-78 - PubMed
  10. JAMA. 1974 Oct 21;230(3):421-5 - PubMed
  11. Med J Aust. 1985 Feb 18;142(4):247-51 - PubMed
  12. Hum Reprod. 1996 Nov;11(11):2449-53 - PubMed
  13. Contraception. 1999 Jun;59(6):357-62 - PubMed
  14. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2008 Jan-Feb;53(1):62-7 - PubMed
  15. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1999 Jun;4(2):75-83 - PubMed
  16. Lancet. 2000 Mar 11;355(9207):922-4 - PubMed
  17. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2005 Aug;18(4):285-8 - PubMed
  18. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul;195(1):92-6 - PubMed
  19. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007 Jun;12(2):97-106 - PubMed
  20. Steroids. 2000 Oct-Nov;65(10-11):807-15 - PubMed
  21. Contraception. 2003 Aug;68(2):89-96 - PubMed
  22. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1996;36:47-81 - PubMed
  23. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;626:43-9 - PubMed
  24. Fertil Steril. 1999 Jul;72(1):115-20 - PubMed
  25. Am J Epidemiol. 1969 Nov;90(5):365-80 - PubMed
  26. Lancet. 1995 Dec 16;346(8990):1575-82 - PubMed
  27. Funct Neurol. 2000;15 Suppl 3:143-53 - PubMed
  28. Contraception. 2001 Jul;64(1):3-10 - PubMed
  29. Contraception. 1994 Jan;49(1):1-32 - PubMed
  30. Contraception. 1999 Nov;60(5):263-7 - PubMed
  31. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;192(4):998-1004 - PubMed
  32. Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Sep-Oct;13(5):421-31 - PubMed
  33. Contraception. 2007 Jan;75(1):23-6 - PubMed
  34. Contraception. 2004 Sep;70(3):191-8 - PubMed
  35. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2001 Aug;15(4):259-64 - PubMed
  36. Contraception. 2007 Jun;75(6):450-3 - PubMed
  37. Drugs. 2007;67(12):1749-65 - PubMed
  38. Contraception. 1990 Jul;42(1):67-96 - PubMed
  39. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1986 Nov;61(4):313-28 - PubMed
  40. Contraception. 2006 May;73(5):537-41 - PubMed
  41. Contraception. 2004 Jan;69(1):37-42 - PubMed
  42. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007 Mar;34(1):43-55, viii - PubMed
  43. Br Med J. 1977 Aug 20;2(6085):487-90 - PubMed
  44. Contraception. 2005 Jan;71(1):55-9 - PubMed
  45. Contraception. 2007 Jun;75(6 Suppl):S93-8 - PubMed
  46. Contraception. 2006 Jan;73(1):41-5 - PubMed
  47. BMJ. 2001 Jul 21;323(7305):131-4 - PubMed
  48. Contraception. 2006 Dec;74(6):439-45 - PubMed
  49. Contraception. 2004 Nov;70(5):359-63 - PubMed
  50. Contraception. 2008 Feb;77(2):114-7 - PubMed
  51. Fertil Steril. 1998 Feb;69(2):258-66 - PubMed
  52. Cancer. 2003 Nov 1;98(9):1870-9 - PubMed
  53. Endocr Rev. 2004 Feb;25(1):45-71 - PubMed
  54. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 22;269(1491):553-62 - PubMed
  55. West J Med. 2000 Nov;173(5):352-6 - PubMed
  56. Contraception. 2007 Jan;75(1):16-22 - PubMed
  57. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007 Oct;16(8):1171-80 - PubMed
  58. Contraception. 2006 Mar;73(3):229-34 - PubMed
  59. Maturitas. 2003 Dec 10;46 Suppl 1:S7-S16 - PubMed
  60. Q Rev Biol. 1994 Sep;69(3):353-67 - PubMed
  61. Q Rev Biol. 1996 Jun;71(2):181-220 - PubMed
  62. Endocr Rev. 2005 May;26(3):423-38 - PubMed
  63. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;101(4):653-61 - PubMed
  64. Contraception. 2007 Jul;76(1):23-9 - PubMed
  65. Q Rev Biol. 1993 Sep;68(3):335-86 - PubMed
  66. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Nov;181(5 Pt 2):45-52 - PubMed
  67. IPPF Med Bull. 1975 Feb;9(1):1-3 - PubMed
  68. Hum Reprod Update. 2005 May-Jun;11(3):293-307 - PubMed
  69. Hum Reprod. 2006 Mar;21(3):573-8 - PubMed
  70. Contraception. 2003 Jan;67(1):1-8 - PubMed

Publication Types