Display options
Share it on

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007 Jan;1(1):62-71. doi: 10.1177/193229680700100111.

Optimizing display, analysis, interpretation and utility of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) data for management of patients with diabetes.

Journal of diabetes science and technology

David Rodbard

Affiliations

  1. American Institutes for Research, Washington DC 20007, USA. [email protected]

PMID: 19888382 PMCID: PMC2769603 DOI: 10.1177/193229680700100111

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) data have not been used to fullest advantage. Few physicians routinely download data from memory-equipped glucose meters and perform systematic analyses and interpretation of the data. There is need for improved methods for display and analysis of SMBG data, for a systematic approach for identification and prioritization of clinical problems revealed by SMBG, for characterization of blood glucose variability, and for clinical decision support.

METHODS: We have developed a systematic approach to the analysis and interpretation of SMBG data to assist in the management of patients with diabetes. This approach utilizes the following criteria: 1) Overall quality of glycemic control; 2) Hypoglycemia (frequency, severity, timing); 3) Hyperglycemia; 4) Variability; 5) Pattern analysis; and 6) Adequacy of monitoring. The "Pattern analysis" includes assessment of: trends by date and by time of day; relationship of blood glucose to meals; post-prandial excursions; the effects of day of the week, and interactions between time of day and day of the week.

RESULTS: The asymmetrical distribution of blood glucose values makes it difficult to interpret the mean and standard deviation. Use of the median (50(th) percentile) and Inter-Quartile Range (IQR) overcomes these difficulties: IQR is the difference between the 75(th) and 25(th) percentiles. SMBG data can be used to predict the A1c level and indices of the risks of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION: Given reliable measures of glucose variability, one can apply a strategy to progressively reduce glucose variability and then increase the intensity of therapy so as to reduce median blood glucose and hence A1c, while minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia.

Keywords: clinical decision support; diabetes; glucose; medical informatics; self-monitoring; statistics; variability

References

  1. Am J Med. 2005 Sep;118(Suppl 9A):20S-26S - PubMed
  2. Comput Biomed Res. 1990 Aug;23(4):346-57 - PubMed
  3. Horm Metab Res. 1995 Jan;27(1):41-2 - PubMed
  4. Diabetes Care. 2006 Jan;29(1):1-8 - PubMed
  5. Diabetes Care. 1988 Nov-Dec;11 Suppl 1:54-61 - PubMed
  6. JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1688-97 - PubMed
  7. JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1681-7 - PubMed
  8. JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1707-8 - PubMed
  9. Diabetes Care. 2005 Feb;28(2):260-5 - PubMed
  10. Diabetes Care. 1980 Mar-Apr;3(2):369-70 - PubMed
  11. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005 Dec;7(6):849-62 - PubMed
  12. Diabetes Care. 1987 Mar-Apr;10(2):225-37 - PubMed
  13. J Diabetes Complications. 2005 May-Jun;19(3):178-81 - PubMed
  14. Methods Enzymol. 2004;384:94-106 - PubMed
  15. Acta Med Scand. 1965 Jan;177:95-102 - PubMed
  16. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Oct 25;164(19):2090-5 - PubMed
  17. Diabetes Care. 1986 Jan-Feb;9(1):61-9 - PubMed
  18. Diabetologia. 2006 Mar;49(3):442-51 - PubMed
  19. Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug;29(8):1757-63 - PubMed
  20. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2002;4(3):295-303 - PubMed
  21. Circulation. 2004 Jul 13;110(2):214-9 - PubMed
  22. Diabetes Care. 2002 Oct;25(10):1845-50 - PubMed
  23. Diabetes Care. 1989 Nov-Dec;12(10):725-36 - PubMed
  24. Diabetes Care. 1987 Jan-Feb;10(1):111-7 - PubMed
  25. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005 Oct;7(5):780-3 - PubMed
  26. Diabetes Care. 2000 Dec;23(12):1830-4 - PubMed
  27. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991;:53-7 - PubMed
  28. Diabetes Care. 2006 Jul;29(7):1486-90 - PubMed
  29. Am J Med. 2001 Jul;111(1):1-9 - PubMed

Publication Types