Display options
Share it on

Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009 Dec;8(12):959-68. doi: 10.1038/nrd2961.

Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation.

Nature reviews. Drug discovery

Bernard Munos

Affiliations

  1. Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA. [email protected]

PMID: 19949401 DOI: 10.1038/nrd2961

Abstract

Despite unprecedented investment in pharmaceutical research and development (R&D), the number of new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) remains low. To help understand this conundrum, this article investigates the record of pharmaceutical innovation by analysing data on the companies that introduced the approximately 1,200 new drugs that have been approved by the FDA since 1950. This analysis shows that the new-drug output from pharmaceutical companies in this period has essentially been constant, and remains so despite the attempts to increase it. This suggests that, contrary to common perception, the new-drug output is not depressed, but may simply reflect the limitations of the current R&D model. The implications of these findings and options to achieve sustainability for the pharmaceutical industry are discussed.

References

  1. Harv Bus Rev. 2008 Mar;86(3):96-102, 134 - PubMed
  2. Science. 2008 Mar 28;319(5871):1750-2 - PubMed
  3. J Health Econ. 1991 Jul;10(2):107-42 - PubMed
  4. Bull World Health Organ. 2006 May;84(5):376-81 - PubMed
  5. J Health Econ. 2003 Mar;22(2):151-85 - PubMed
  6. Cell. 2008 Apr 18;133(2):201-3 - PubMed
  7. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006 Sep;5(9):723-9 - PubMed
  8. J Comb Chem. 2009 Jan-Feb;11(1):3-13 - PubMed
  9. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jul-Aug;22(4):119-27 - PubMed
  10. Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Oct;25(10):1072 - PubMed
  11. J Law Econ. 1978;21(1):133-63 - PubMed
  12. Harv Bus Rev. 2008 May;86(5):68-70, 72-6, 128 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types