Display options
Share it on

J Med Case Rep. 2009 Jul 22;3:8387. doi: 10.4076/1752-1947-3-8387.

Cornual pregnancy as a complicaton of the use of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device: a case report.

Journal of medical case reports

Jj Beltman, Cjm de Groot

Affiliations

  1. Medisch Centrum Haaglanden, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Lijnbaan 32, 2501 CK, The Hague The Netherlands.

PMID: 19830226 PMCID: PMC2737761 DOI: 10.4076/1752-1947-3-8387

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Complications of copper load intrauterine devices, including ectopic pregnancies are well reported. Rates of ectopic pregnancy are 0.6 to 1.1% per year. However, the levonorgestrel intrauterine device has been described as more protective against ectopic pregnancies due to the addition of the hormone levonorgestrel. The hormone released from the intrauterine device causes some systemic effects, but local effects such as glandular atrophy and stromal decidualization, in addition to foreign body reaction, are dominant. Few case reports have described ampullary ectopic pregnancies. However, we report, for the first time, a major complication of levonorgestrel intrauterine device: a cornual pregnancy.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old Caucasian nulliparous woman presented with complaints of progressive nausea, abdominal pain and irregular vaginal bleeding for 2 months. For 3 years, she had been using a levonorgestrel intrauterine device. A two-dimensional transvaginal sonogram noted a sac situated external to the endometrial cavity in the right cornua of the uterus with an empty uterus. She was successfully treated with chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION: Many complications have been described, including ectopic pregnancies, using copper intrauterine devices. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is a particularly good choice for adolescents because of associated non-contraceptive benefits such as decreased menstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhea and pain associated with endometriosis [1]. Yet a cornual pregnancy following the use of a levonorgestrel intrauterine device is a complication which, to our knowledge, has not been described before. Physicians prescribing this type of intrauterine device should be aware of this rare event.

References

  1. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;20(5):464-9 - PubMed
  2. Contraception. 1987 Aug;36(2):169-79 - PubMed
  3. BJOG. 2004 Nov;111(11):1283-8 - PubMed
  4. Fertil Steril. 2006 Dec;86(6):1764.e11-4 - PubMed
  5. Contraception. 1990 Oct;42(4):361-78 - PubMed
  6. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66(2):131-5 - PubMed
  7. J Reprod Med. 2000 Jun;45(6):490-2 - PubMed
  8. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1996 Dec;1(4):319-23 - PubMed
  9. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1997;24(3):127-9 - PubMed
  10. Presse Med. 1995 Feb 18;24(7):351-5 - PubMed
  11. Contracept Fertil Sex. 1996 Feb;24(2):135-9 - PubMed
  12. Epidemiol Rev. 1987;9:70-94 - PubMed

Publication Types