Display options
Share it on

Cell Mol Bioeng. 2009 Mar 01;2(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s12195-009-0050-1.

Modulation of elasticity in functionally distinct domains of the tropomyosin coiled-coil.

Cellular and molecular bioengineering

Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju, Wonmuk Hwang

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843 Tel.: +1-979-458-0178, , [email protected].

PMID: 19830262 PMCID: PMC2760843 DOI: 10.1007/s12195-009-0050-1

Abstract

Alpha-helical coiled-coils are common protein structural motifs. Whereas vast information is available regarding their structure, folding, and stability, far less is known about their elastic properties, even though they play mechanical roles in many cases such as tropomyosin in muscle contraction or neck stalks of kinesin or myosin motor proteins. Using computer simulations, we characterized elastic properties of coiled-coils, either globally or locally. Global bending stiffness of standard leucine zipper coiled-coils was calculated using normal mode analysis. Mutations in hydrophobic residues involved in the knob-into-hole interface between the two alpha-helices affect elasticity significantly, whereas charged side chains forming inter-helical salt bridges do not. This suggests that coiled-coils with less regular heptad periodicity may have regional variations in flexibility. We show this by the flexibility map of tropomyosin, which was constructed by a local fluctuation analysis. Overall, flexibility varies by more than twofold and increases towards the C-terminal region of the molecule. Describing the coiled-coil as a twisted tape, it is generally more flexible in the splay bending than in the bending of the broad face. Actin binding sites in alpha zones show local rigidity minima. Broken core regions due to acidic residues at the hydrophobic face such as the Asp137 and the Glu218 are found to be the most labile with moduli for splay and broad face bending as 70 nm and 116 nm respectively. Such variation in flexibility could be relevant to the tropomyosin function, especially for moving across the non-uniform surface of F-actin to regulate myosin binding.

References

  1. Biochemistry. 2007 Dec 25;46(51):14917-27 - PubMed
  2. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2001 Apr;33(4):723-32 - PubMed
  3. J Comput Chem. 2001 Nov 30;22(15):1857-1879 - PubMed
  4. Proteins. 2000 Jan 1;38(1):49-59 - PubMed
  5. J Mol Biol. 1995 Jun 23;249(5):967-87 - PubMed
  6. J Chem Phys. 2005 Jun 22;122(24):244912 - PubMed
  7. J Mol Biol. 1986 Nov 5;192(1):111-31 - PubMed
  8. Biophys J. 2008 Jul;95(2):710-9 - PubMed
  9. J Mol Biol. 1976 May 15;103(2):271-98 - PubMed
  10. J Microsc. 2008 Sep;231(3):446-54 - PubMed
  11. Biophys J. 2008 May 15;94(10):3779-89 - PubMed
  12. Biophys J. 2006 Apr 1;90(7):2510-24 - PubMed
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 27;102(52):18878-83 - PubMed
  14. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2008 Feb;65(2):156-64 - PubMed
  15. J Mol Graph. 1996 Feb;14(1):33-8, 27-8 - PubMed
  16. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2001;22(1):5-49 - PubMed
  17. Biochemistry. 1982 Aug 17;21(17):4064-73 - PubMed
  18. Adv Protein Chem. 2005;71:121-59 - PubMed
  19. Biopolymers. 1996 Jan;38(1):89-95 - PubMed
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 24;100(13):7581-6 - PubMed
  21. Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Dec 15;97(24):248101 - PubMed
  22. J Mol Biol. 1996 Jan 26;255(3):367-72 - PubMed
  23. J Physiol. 2004 Apr 15;556(Pt 2):531-43 - PubMed
  24. Phys Rev Lett. 2009 Mar 20;102(11):118102 - PubMed
  25. Protein Sci. 2003 Jul;12(7):1395-405 - PubMed
  26. Proteins. 1996 Oct;26(2):134-45 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support