Display options
Cite
Reach G. A novel conceptual framework for understanding the mechanism of adherence to long term therapies. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2008;2:7-19
Reach, G. (2008). A novel conceptual framework for understanding the mechanism of adherence to long term therapies. Patient preference and adherence, 27-19.
Reach, Gérard. "A novel conceptual framework for understanding the mechanism of adherence to long term therapies." Patient preference and adherence vol. 2 (2008): 7-19.
Reach G. A novel conceptual framework for understanding the mechanism of adherence to long term therapies. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2008 Feb 02;2:7-19. PMID: 19920939; PMCID: PMC2770416.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2008 Feb 02;2:7-19.

A novel conceptual framework for understanding the mechanism of adherence to long term therapies.

Patient preference and adherence

Gérard Reach

Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Avicenne Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, and Laboratory of Pedagogy of Health, EA 3412, University Paris 13, CRNH-Idf, Bobigny, France.

PMID: 19920939 PMCID: PMC2770416

Abstract

The World Health Organization claimed recently that improving patient adherence to long term therapies would be more beneficial than any biomedical progress. First, however, we must understand its mechanisms. In this paper I propose a novel approach using concepts elaborated in a field rarely explored in medicine, the philosophy of mind. While conventional psychological models (eg, the Health Belief Model) provide explanations and predictions which have only a statistical value, the philosophical assumption that mental states (eg, beliefs) are causally efficient (mental causation) can provide the basis for a causal theory of health behaviors. This paper shows that nonadherence to long term therapies can be described as the medical expression of a philosophical concept, that is, weakness of will. I use philosophical explanations of this concept to suggest a mechanistic explanation of nonadherence. I propose that it results from the failure of two principles of rationality. First, a principle of continence, described by the philosopher Donald Davidson in his explanation of weakness of will. This principle exhorts us to act after having considered all available arguments and according to which option we consider best. However, patients conforming to this principle of continence should rationally be nonadherent. Indeed, when patients face a choice between adherence and nonadherence, they must decide, in general, between a large, but delayed reward (eg, health) and a small, but immediate reward (eg, smoking a cigarette). According to concepts elaborated by George Ainslie and Jon Elster, the force of our desires is strongly influenced by the proximity of reward. This inter-temporal choice theory on one hand, and the mere principle of continence on the other, should therefore lead to nonadherence. Nevertheless, adherence to long term therapies is possible, as a result of the intervention of an additional principle, the principle of foresight, which tells us to give priority to mental states oriented towards the future.

Keywords: causal theory of health behaviors; chronic diseases; inter-temporal choice; patient adherence; philosophy of mind; principle of foresight; weakness of will

References

  1. Nebr Symp Motiv. 1980;27:195-259 - PubMed
  2. Psychol Psychother. 2005 Mar;78(Pt 1):95-111 - PubMed
  3. Am Psychol. 1990 Aug;45(8):921-33 - PubMed
  4. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2002 Nov 25;2:8 - PubMed
  5. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1998 Jan;39(1):23-9 - PubMed
  6. Pediatr Transplant. 2006 May;10(3):323-30 - PubMed
  7. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jan;56(1):98-103 - PubMed
  8. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996 Jun;15(6):631-45 - PubMed
  9. Diabet Med. 2005 Apr;22(4):415-20 - PubMed
  10. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Nov 27;160(21):3278-85 - PubMed
  11. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Aug 1;166(3):348-54 - PubMed
  12. J Clin Nurs. 2001 Sep;10(5):618-27 - PubMed
  13. Presse Med. 2000 Nov 18;29(35):1939-46 - PubMed
  14. Ann Fam Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;2(1):26-32 - PubMed
  15. Med Care. 1975 Jan;13(1):10-24 - PubMed
  16. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Feb-Mar;46(4-5):461-5 - PubMed
  17. Diabetes Care. 1997 Feb;20(2):215-8 - PubMed
  18. Diabetes Care. 1999 Apr;22(4):635-9 - PubMed
  19. Diabetes Care. 1990 Apr;13(4):441-3 - PubMed
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):485-9 - PubMed
  21. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390-5 - PubMed
  22. Health Educ Monogr. 1978 Spring;6(2):107-17 - PubMed
  23. BMJ. 2006 Jul 1;333(7557):15 - PubMed
  24. Diabetes Care. 2004 May;27(5):1218-24 - PubMed
  25. BMC Womens Health. 2004 Aug 25;4 Suppl 1:S5 - PubMed
  26. Public Health Nutr. 1999 Jun;2(2):209-15 - PubMed
  27. Int J STD AIDS. 2007 Jan;18(1):28-32 - PubMed
  28. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005 Jul-Aug;18(4):262-70 - PubMed

Publication Types