Display options
Share it on

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2008 Feb 02;2:315-22. doi: 10.2147/ppa.s4302.

Design and development of a decision aid to enhance shared decision making by patients with an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Patient preference and adherence

Dirk T Ubbink, Anouk M Knops, Sjaak Molenaar, Astrid Goossens

Affiliations

  1. Department of Quality Assurance and Process Innovation and.

PMID: 19920978 PMCID: PMC2770394 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s4302

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To design, develop, and evaluate an evidence-based decision aid (DA) for patients with an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) to inform them about the pros and cons of their treatment options (ie, surgery or watchful observation) and to help them make a shared decision.

METHODS: A multidisciplinary team defined criteria for the desired DA as to design, medical content and functionality, particularly for elderly users. Development was according to the international standard (IPDAS). Fifteen patients with an AAA, who were either treated or not yet treated, evaluated the tool.

RESULTS: A DA was developed to offer information about the disease, the risks and benefits of surgical treatment and watchful observation, and the individual possibilities and threats based on the patient's aneurysm diameter and risk profile. The DA was improved and judged favorably by physicians and patients.

CONCLUSION: This evidence-based DA for AAA patients, developed according to IPDAS criteria, is likely to be a simple, user-friendly tool to offer patients evidence-based information about the pros and cons of treatment options for AAA, to improve patients' understanding of the disease and treatment options, and may support decision making based on individual values.

Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm; decision making; decision support techniques; program development; research design

References

  1. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb;47(2):277-81 - PubMed
  2. Br J Surg. 2005 Aug;92(8):937-46 - PubMed
  3. Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Sep;54(3):255-63 - PubMed
  4. Br J Surg. 2008 Jun;95(6):677-84 - PubMed
  5. Int J Med Inform. 2004 Aug;73(7-8):551-7 - PubMed
  6. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Oct;44(4):712-6; discussion 717 - PubMed
  7. JAMA. 2004 Jul 28;292(4):435-41 - PubMed
  8. Health Expect. 2008 Mar;11(1):35-45 - PubMed
  9. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 15;19(6):1676-87 - PubMed
  10. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 Jun 20;5:16 - PubMed
  11. Lancet. 2004 Sep 4-10;364(9437):843-8 - PubMed
  12. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 8;348(19):1884 - PubMed
  13. CMAJ. 1997 Aug 15;157(4):383-9 - PubMed
  14. Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):554-74 - PubMed
  15. Lancet. 1998 Nov 21;352(9141):1649-55 - PubMed
  16. Circulation. 2006 Mar 21;113(11):e463-654 - PubMed
  17. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 9;352(23):2398-405 - PubMed
  18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD001431 - PubMed
  19. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Sep;49(5):651-61 - PubMed
  20. BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417 - PubMed
  21. Br J Surg. 2003 Jul;90(7):838-44 - PubMed
  22. N Engl J Med. 2002 May 9;346(19):1445-52 - PubMed
  23. Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):599-608 - PubMed
  24. Br J Surg. 2006 Feb;93(2):191-4 - PubMed

Publication Types