Display options
Cite
Bradley RD, Durish ND, Rogers DS, et al. TOWARD A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY FOR PEROMYSCUS: EVIDENCE FROM MITOCHONDRIAL CYTOCHROME-b SEQUENCES. J Mammal. 2007;88(5):1146-1159doi: 10.1644/06-MAMM-A-342R.1.
Bradley, R. D., Durish, N. D., Rogers, D. S., Miller, J. R., Engstrom, M. D., & Kilpatrick, C. W. (2007). TOWARD A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY FOR PEROMYSCUS: EVIDENCE FROM MITOCHONDRIAL CYTOCHROME-b SEQUENCES. Journal of mammalogy, 88(5), 1146-1159. https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-342R.1
Bradley, Robert D, et al. "TOWARD A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY FOR PEROMYSCUS: EVIDENCE FROM MITOCHONDRIAL CYTOCHROME-b SEQUENCES." Journal of mammalogy vol. 88,5 (2007): 1146-1159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-342R.1
Bradley RD, Durish ND, Rogers DS, Miller JR, Engstrom MD, Kilpatrick CW. TOWARD A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY FOR PEROMYSCUS: EVIDENCE FROM MITOCHONDRIAL CYTOCHROME-b SEQUENCES. J Mammal. 2007 Jan 01;88(5):1146-1159. doi: 10.1644/06-MAMM-A-342R.1. PMID: 19924266; PMCID: PMC2778318.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Mammal. 2007 Jan 01;88(5):1146-1159. doi: 10.1644/06-MAMM-A-342R.1.

TOWARD A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY FOR PEROMYSCUS: EVIDENCE FROM MITOCHONDRIAL CYTOCHROME-b SEQUENCES.

Journal of mammalogy

Robert D Bradley, Nevin D Durish, Duke S Rogers, Jacqueline R Miller, Mark D Engstrom, C William Kilpatrick

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA.

PMID: 19924266 PMCID: PMC2778318 DOI: 10.1644/06-MAMM-A-342R.1

Abstract

One hundred DNA sequences from the mitochondrial cytochrome-b gene of 44 species of deer mice (Peromyscus (sensu stricto), 1 of Habromys, 1 of Isthmomys, 2 of Megadontomys, and the monotypic genera Neotomodon, Osgoodomys, and Podomys were used to develop a molecular phylogeny for Peromyscus. Phylogenetic analyses (maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian inference) were conducted to evaluate alternative hypotheses concerning taxonomic arrangements (sensu stricto versus sensu lato) of the genus. In all analyses, monophyletic clades were obtained that corresponded to species groups proposed by previous authors; however, relationships among species groups generally were poorly resolved. The concept of the genus Peromyscus based on molecular data differed significantly from the most current taxonomic arrangement. Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian trees depicted strong support for a clade placing Habromys, Megadontomys, Neotomodon, Osgoodomys, and Podomys within Peromyscus. If Habromys, Megadontomys, Neotomodon, Osgoodomys, and Podomys are regarded as genera, then several species groups within Peromyscus (sensu stricto) should be elevated to generic rank. Isthmomys was associated with the genus Reithrodontomys; in turn this clade was sister to Baiomys, indicating a distant relationship of Isthmomys to Peromyscus. A formal taxonomic revision awaits synthesis of additional sequence data from nuclear markers together with inclusion of available allozymic and karyotypic data.

References

  1. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1985 Mar;34(2):355-60 - PubMed
  2. J Mol Evol. 1991 Feb;32(2):128-44 - PubMed
  3. Evolution. 1978 Sep;32(3):646-654 - PubMed
  4. J Wildl Dis. 2004 Jan;40(1):103-9 - PubMed
  5. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1984;38(2):106-11 - PubMed
  6. Chromosoma. 1990 Jul;99(3):183-9 - PubMed
  7. J Med Entomol. 1993 May;30(3):614-8 - PubMed
  8. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1994;66(3):181-95 - PubMed
  9. Syst Biol. 1997 Sep;46(3):426-40 - PubMed
  10. Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):817-8 - PubMed
  11. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1989;50(1):1-5 - PubMed
  12. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Nov;12(6):988-1001 - PubMed
  13. J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111-20 - PubMed
  14. J Biol Chem. 1993 Nov 25;268(33):24933-9 - PubMed
  15. Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Jul;17(7):1081-90 - PubMed
  16. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Sep;13(7):933-42 - PubMed
  17. J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jun;26(6):1138-41 - PubMed
  18. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Feb;18(2):132-43 - PubMed
  19. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997 Mar;56(3):273-84 - PubMed
  20. Science. 1988 Jan 29;239(4839):487-91 - PubMed
  21. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2000 May;15(2):215-34 - PubMed
  22. J Biol Chem. 1987 Jun 5;262(16):7497-503 - PubMed
  23. J Virol. 1998 Jan;72(1):57-64 - PubMed
  24. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Jul;130(1):143-50 - PubMed
  25. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1995 Dec;4(4):448-56 - PubMed
  26. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2000 Sep;16(3):366-78 - PubMed
  27. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002 Jul;8(7):717-21 - PubMed
  28. Evolution. 1978 Sep;32(3):565-579 - PubMed
  29. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1981;31(4):194-202 - PubMed
  30. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995 May;52(5):393-7 - PubMed
  31. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25 - PubMed
  32. J Mol Evol. 1995 Mar;40(3):260-72 - PubMed
  33. Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5 - PubMed
  34. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Jul;40(1):251-8 - PubMed
  35. Genesis. 2001 Mar;29(3):105-9 - PubMed
  36. Chromosoma. 1986;94(6):425-32 - PubMed
  37. J Mammal. 2006 Aug 1;87(4):643-662 - PubMed
  38. J Infect Dis. 1994 Jun;169(6):1271-80 - PubMed
  39. J Mammal. 1978 Nov;59(4):820-34 - PubMed
  40. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1975 Dec 15;52(4):541-5 - PubMed
  41. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1988;48(1):55-7 - PubMed
  42. J Mol Evol. 2001 Aug;53(2):89-103 - PubMed
  43. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004 May;124(1):1-16 - PubMed
  44. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Nov;15(11):1381-9 - PubMed
  45. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Jan;15(1):35-49 - PubMed
  46. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1977;19(1):38-43 - PubMed
  47. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997 Apr-Jun;3(2):183-90 - PubMed
  48. Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jul;19(7):1053-65 - PubMed
  49. Hum Genet. 1997 Aug;100(2):182-8 - PubMed
  50. Evolution. 1986 Jan;40(1):208-213 - PubMed
  51. Genome. 1988 Feb;30(1):44-7 - PubMed
  52. Chromosoma. 1986;93(3):203-12 - PubMed
  53. Evolution. 1985 Jul;39(4):783-791 - PubMed
  54. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Oct;29(1):126-38 - PubMed
  55. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Dec;13(10):1339-50 - PubMed
  56. Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Jul;17(7):1022-31 - PubMed
  57. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995 Feb 1;316(2):879-85 - PubMed
  58. J Hered. 2001 Jul-Aug;92(4):371-3 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support