Display options
Share it on

PLoS Curr. 2009 Oct 21;1:RRN1120. doi: 10.1371/currents.rrn1120.

Improving the diagnostic efficiency of H1N1 2009 pandemic flu: analysis of predictive clinical signs through a prospective cohort.

PLoS currents

Philippe Brouqui, Vinh Vu Hai, Antoine Nougairede, Jean-Christophe Lagier, Elisabeth Botelho, Laetitia Ninove, Christine Zandotti, Remi N Charrel, Xavier De Lamballerie, Didier Raoult

Affiliations

  1. Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine at Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, CHU Nord AP-HN, URMITE CNRS/RD 6236, Faculté de Médecine, Université de la Méditérranée, Marseille, France.

PMID: 20029658 PMCID: PMC2766591 DOI: 10.1371/currents.rrn1120

Abstract

In late June 2009, we set up a dedicated flu-like illness outpatient consultation in the Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine department of Marseille university hospital to detect the new A/H1N1 pandemic influenza and to contain efficiently the A/H1N1 infected patients. For 3 months, we compiled data corresponding to a total of 307 patients who presented with a flu-like syndrome. 31 of them were positive for H1N1 pandemic flu through real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR); among them, 19 were positive for a rapid influenza detection test (RIDT). We report here the significant clinical characteristics of A/H1N1 pandemic flu patients compared with other flu-like illnesses, which were used to improve the predictive value of the diagnosis in the current epidemiological situation. We found that regardless of the prevalence of A/H1N1 positive cases in the suspected patients, the absence of cough rejects the diagnosis of A/H1N1 infection in 100% of cases. Among patients referred for flu-like illness, those with cough should be tested for A/H1N1 by RIDT. In the current situation, the PPV and NPV of RIDT for H1N1 reached 90.5% and 95.8 %, respectively. It is important to notice that the 2 RIDT-positive that were negative for H1N1 were seasonal H3N2 influenza indicating that specificity and PPV of RIDT for all influenza was 100%. Therefore, positive RIDT does not require rRT-PCR confirmatory test. Only negative RIDT should be tested with rRT-PCR assay. Respecting this algorithm would have saved up to 70,000 Euros ( 100.000 USD) for the 307 patients and would have resulted in a significant gain of time to transmit the laboratory results to the clinical ward.

References

  1. J Clin Virol. 2009 Jul;45(3):191-5 - PubMed
  2. Euro Surveill. 2009 Aug 20;14(33): - PubMed
  3. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010 Apr;10(3):237-40 - PubMed
  4. PLoS Curr. 2009 Sep 21;1:RRN1039 - PubMed
  5. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Aug 7;58(30):826-9 - PubMed
  6. Lancet. 2009 Aug 8;374(9688):451-8 - PubMed

Publication Types