Display options
Share it on

Atmos Environ (1994). 2009 Nov;43(36):5750-5758. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.066.

Determinants of Indoor and Personal Exposure to PM(2.5) of Indoor and Outdoor Origin during the RIOPA Study.

Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994)

Qing Yu Meng, Dalia Spector, Steven Colome, Barbara Turpin

Affiliations

  1. Research Fellow at National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.

PMID: 20339526 PMCID: PMC2842982 DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.066

Abstract

Effects of physical/environmental factors on fine particle (PM(2.5)) exposure, outdoor-to-indoor transport and air exchange rate (AER) were examined. The fraction of ambient PM(2.5) found indoors (F(INF)) and the fraction to which people are exposed (alpha) modify personal exposure to ambient PM(2.5). Because F(INF), alpha, and AER are infrequently measured, some have used air conditioning (AC) as a modifier of ambient PM(2.5) exposure. We found no single variable that was a good predictor of AER. About 50% and 40% of the variation in F(INF) and alpha, respectively, was explained by AER and other activity variables. AER alone explained 36% and 24% of the variations in F(INF) and alpha, respectively. Each other predictor, including Central AC Operation, accounted for less than 4% of the variation. This highlights the importance of AER measurements to predict F(INF) and alpha. Evidence presented suggests that outdoor temperature and home ventilation features affect particle losses as well as AER, and the effects differ.Total personal exposures to PM(2.5) mass/species were reconstructed using personal activity and microenvironmental methods, and compared to direct personal measurement. Outdoor concentration was the dominant predictor of (partial R(2) = 30-70%) and the largest contributor to (20-90%) indoor and personal exposures for PM(2.5) mass and most species. Several activities had a dramatic impact on personal PM(2.5) mass/species exposures for the few study participants exposed to or engaged in them, including smoking and woodworking. Incorporating personal activities (in addition to outdoor PM(2.5)) improved the predictive power of the personal activity model for PM(2.5) mass/species; more detailed information about personal activities and indoor sources is needed for further improvement (especially for Ca, K, OC). Adequate accounting for particle penetration and persistence indoors and for exposure to non-ambient sources could potentially increase the power of epidemiological analyses linking health effects to particulate exposures.

References

  1. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2001 May-Jun;11(3):231-52 - PubMed
  2. Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Jul 15;39(14):5105-12 - PubMed
  3. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 May;17(3):279-87 - PubMed
  4. Environ Sci Technol. 2001 May 15;35(10):2089-99 - PubMed
  5. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 1996 Feb;46(2):98-126 - PubMed
  6. Sci Total Environ. 2001 Aug 10;276(1-3):33-47 - PubMed
  7. Epidemiology. 2008 Sep;19(5):680-9 - PubMed
  8. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2006 Jul;16(4):321-31 - PubMed
  9. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;17(2):124-33 - PubMed
  10. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2006 May;16(3):264-74 - PubMed
  11. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2007 Aug;(130 Pt 2):1-77; discussion 79-92 - PubMed
  12. Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Nov 1;41(21):7315-21 - PubMed
  13. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;17(5):433-44 - PubMed
  14. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2002 Jul;12(4):296-306 - PubMed
  15. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2002 Feb;52(2):147-59 - PubMed
  16. ScientificWorldJournal. 2001 Sep 13;1:443-57 - PubMed
  17. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2005 Nov;(130 Pt 1):1-107; discussion 109-27 - PubMed
  18. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;17(6):549-58 - PubMed
  19. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1995 Jul-Sep;5(3):229-32 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support