Display options
Cite
Broaddus MR, Morris H, Bryan AD. 'It's Not What You Said, It's How You Said It': Perceptions of Condom Proposers by Gender and Strategy. Sex Roles. 2010;62(9):603-614doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9728-z.
Broaddus, M. R., Morris, H., & Bryan, A. D. (2010). 'It's Not What You Said, It's How You Said It': Perceptions of Condom Proposers by Gender and Strategy. Sex roles, 62(9), 603-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9728-z
Broaddus, Michelle R, et al. "'It's Not What You Said, It's How You Said It': Perceptions of Condom Proposers by Gender and Strategy." Sex roles vol. 62,9 (2010): 603-614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9728-z
Broaddus MR, Morris H, Bryan AD. 'It's Not What You Said, It's How You Said It': Perceptions of Condom Proposers by Gender and Strategy. Sex Roles. 2010 May 01;62(9):603-614. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9728-z. PMID: 20544008; PMCID: PMC2882313.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Sex Roles. 2010 May 01;62(9):603-614. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9728-z.

'It's Not What You Said, It's How You Said It': Perceptions of Condom Proposers by Gender and Strategy.

Sex roles

Michelle R Broaddus, Heather Morris, Angela D Bryan

Affiliations

  1. Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, 2071 N. Summit Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53212, USA.

PMID: 20544008 PMCID: PMC2882313 DOI: 10.1007/s11199-009-9728-z

Abstract

We examined effects of proposer gender and condom negotiation strategy on perceptions of condom proposers in undergraduates in the southwestern regions of the US. Using a video manipulation (N=150), a female proposer was evaluated no more harshly than a male proposer, and was evaluated more positively in some ways. In a vignette manipulation (N=193) a female proposer using an Eroticization negotiation strategy (compared to Refusal of sex or Explanation of consequences) was seen as more exciting and likely to engage in sex. Surprisingly, women were harsher judges than men of a female condom proposer using an Eroticization strategy. Greater attention should be paid to the nature of condom negotiation within the framework of the sexual script.

References

  1. AIDS Educ Prev. 2007 Aug;19(4):334-45 - PubMed
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Dec;75(6):1528-58 - PubMed
  3. Women Health. 2001;33(3-4):133-48 - PubMed
  4. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004;8(4):339-63 - PubMed
  5. Psychol Women Q. 1997;21(3):447-64 - PubMed
  6. Health Educ Behav. 2000 Oct;27(5):539-65 - PubMed
  7. Br J Health Psychol. 2007 Feb;12(Pt 1):51-63 - PubMed
  8. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Jun;60(6):870-83 - PubMed
  9. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1999 Jul-Aug;20(4):333-55 - PubMed
  10. J Health Commun. 2006 Jun;11(4):365-90 - PubMed
  11. J Sex Marital Ther. 1999 Jul-Sep;25(3):217-25 - PubMed
  12. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):878-902 - PubMed
  13. Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Apr;38(2):283-9 - PubMed
  14. J Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug;141(4):443-56 - PubMed
  15. Arch Sex Behav. 1986 Apr;15(2):97-120 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Women Q. 1995;19(4):563-81 - PubMed
  17. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Aug;71(2):230-44 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support