Display options
Share it on

J Mem Lang. 2003 Oct;49(3):396-413. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00072-X.

Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks.

Journal of memory and language

Carol A Fowler, Julie M Brown, Laura Sabadini, Jeffrey Weihing

Affiliations

  1. Haskins Laboratories, 270 Crown Street, New Haven, CT 06511-6695, USA.

PMID: 20622982 PMCID: PMC2901126 DOI: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00072-X

Abstract

Participants took part in two speech tests. In both tests, a model speaker produced vowel-consonant-vowels (VCVs) in which the initial vowel varied unpredictably in duration. In the simple response task, participants shadowed the initial vowel; when the model shifted to production of any of three CVs (/pa/, /ta/ or /ka/), participants produced a CV that they were assigned to say (one of /pa/, /ta/ or /ka/). In the choice task, participants shadowed the initial vowel; when the model shifted to a CV, participants shadowed that too. We found that, measured from the model's onset of closure for the consonant to the participant's closure onset, response times in the choice task exceeded those in the simple task by just 26 ms. This is much shorter than the canonical difference between simple and choice latencies [100-150 ms according to Luce (1986)] and is near the fastest simple times that Luce reports. The findings imply rapid access to articulatory speech information in the choice task. A second experiment found much longer choice times when the perception-production link for speech could not be exploited. A third experiment and an acoustic analysis verified that our measurement from closure in Experiment 1 provided a valid marker of speakers' onsets of consonant production. A final experiment showed that shadowing responses are imitations of the model's speech. We interpret the findings as evidence that listeners rapidly extract information about speakers' articulatory gestures.

References

  1. Phonetica. 2000 Apr-Dec;57(2-4):189-96 - PubMed
  2. J Neurophysiol. 1995 Jun;73(6):2608-11 - PubMed
  3. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr;26(2):634-47 - PubMed
  4. Nature. 1976 Dec 23-30;264(5588):746-8 - PubMed
  5. Psychol Rev. 1967 Nov;74(6):431-61 - PubMed
  6. J Speech Hear Res. 1980 Sep;23(3):593-602 - PubMed
  7. J Acoust Soc Am. 1980 Apr;67(4):1349-56 - PubMed
  8. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun;21(3):635-52 - PubMed
  9. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982 Jun;8(3):473-88 - PubMed
  10. Percept Psychophys. 1984 Jan;35(1):49-64 - PubMed
  11. Science. 1998 Feb 20;279(5354):1213-6 - PubMed
  12. Psychol Rev. 1998 Oct;105(4):611-33 - PubMed
  13. J Exp Psychol. 1970 Oct;86(1):97-102 - PubMed
  14. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 May;4(5):187-196 - PubMed
  15. Cognition. 1985 Oct;21(1):1-36 - PubMed
  16. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Mar;3(2):131-41 - PubMed
  17. J Acoust Soc Am. 1981 Feb;69(2):559-67 - PubMed
  18. Psychol Rev. 1998 Apr;105(2):251-79 - PubMed
  19. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):849-78; discussion 878-937 - PubMed
  20. J Exp Psychol. 1971 Jun;88(3):354-60 - PubMed
  21. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Sep;132(3):331-50 - PubMed
  22. Early Dev Parent. 1997 Sep;6(3-4):179-192 - PubMed
  23. Eur J Neurosci. 2002 Jan;15(2):399-402 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support