Display options
Cite
Gorini A, Griez E, Petrova A, et al. Assessment of the emotional responses produced by exposure to real food, virtual food and photographs of food in patients affected by eating disorders. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2010;9:30doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-9-30.
Gorini, A., Griez, E., Petrova, A., & Riva, G. (2010). Assessment of the emotional responses produced by exposure to real food, virtual food and photographs of food in patients affected by eating disorders. Annals of general psychiatry, 930. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-9-30
Gorini, Alessandra, et al. "Assessment of the emotional responses produced by exposure to real food, virtual food and photographs of food in patients affected by eating disorders." Annals of general psychiatry vol. 9 (2010): 30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-9-30
Gorini A, Griez E, Petrova A, Riva G. Assessment of the emotional responses produced by exposure to real food, virtual food and photographs of food in patients affected by eating disorders. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jul 05;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-9-30. PMID: 20602749; PMCID: PMC2914081.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jul 05;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-9-30.

Assessment of the emotional responses produced by exposure to real food, virtual food and photographs of food in patients affected by eating disorders.

Annals of general psychiatry

Alessandra Gorini, Eric Griez, Anna Petrova, Giuseppe Riva

Affiliations

  1. Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology Laboratory, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCSS, Milan, Italy. [email protected].

PMID: 20602749 PMCID: PMC2914081 DOI: 10.1186/1744-859X-9-30

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many researchers and clinicians have proposed using virtual reality (VR) in adjunct to in vivo exposure therapy to provide an innovative form of exposure to patients suffering from different psychological disorders. The rationale behind the 'virtual approach' is that real and virtual exposures elicit a comparable emotional reaction in subjects, even if, to date, there are no experimental data that directly compare these two conditions. To test whether virtual stimuli are as effective as real stimuli, and more effective than photographs in the anxiety induction process, we tested the emotional reactions to real food (RF), virtual reality (VR) food and photographs (PH) of food in two samples of patients affected, respectively, by anorexia (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) compared to a group of healthy subjects. The two main hypotheses were the following: (a) the virtual exposure elicits emotional responses comparable to those produced by the real exposure; (b) the sense of presence induced by the VR immersion makes the virtual experience more ecological, and consequently more effective than static pictures in producing emotional responses in humans.

METHODS: In total, 10 AN, 10 BN and 10 healthy control subjects (CTR) were randomly exposed to three experimental conditions: RF, PH, and VR while their psychological (Stait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) and visual analogue scale for anxiety (VAS-A)) and physiological (heart rate, respiration rate, and skin conductance) responses were recorded.

RESULTS: RF and VR induced a comparable emotional reaction in patients higher than the one elicited by the PH condition. We also found a significant effect in the subjects' degree of presence experienced in the VR condition about their level of perceived anxiety (STAI-S and VAS-A): the higher the sense of presence, the stronger the level of anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS: Even though preliminary, the present data show that VR is more effective than PH in eliciting emotional responses similar to those expected in real life situations. More generally, the present study suggests the potential of VR in a variety of experimental, training and clinical contexts, being its range of possibilities extremely wide and customizable. In particular, in a psychological perspective based on a cognitive behavioral approach, the use of VR enables the provision of specific contexts to help patients to cope with their diseases thanks to an easily controlled stimulation.

References

  1. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57 - PubMed
  2. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 Feb;8(2):215-33 - PubMed
  3. Behav Modif. 2009 Nov;33(6):830-54 - PubMed
  4. J Pediatr. 2001 Jul;139(1):51-7 - PubMed
  5. Int J Eat Disord. 2003 Sep;34(2):227-34 - PubMed
  6. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1999;2(3):241-8 - PubMed
  7. Anxiety. 1996;2(6):296-302 - PubMed
  8. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006 Oct;9(5):507-13 - PubMed
  9. Int J Obes (Lond). 2009 Aug;33(8):905-12 - PubMed
  10. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:394-9 - PubMed
  11. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 May;42(5):343-54 - PubMed
  12. J Psychosom Res. 1980;24(3-4):119-24 - PubMed
  13. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;99:37-54 - PubMed
  14. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 1981 Sep-Dec;5(5-6):337-49 - PubMed
  15. Int J Eat Disord. 2002 Apr;31(3):240-50 - PubMed
  16. Addict Behav. 2004 Dec;29(9):1889-94 - PubMed
  17. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005 Dec;8(6):532-7 - PubMed
  18. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:268-73 - PubMed
  19. Hum Factors. 1998 Sep;40(3):469-77 - PubMed
  20. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006 Oct;9(5):627-33 - PubMed
  21. Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):45-56 - PubMed
  22. Appetite. 2004 Feb;42(1):33-40 - PubMed
  23. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;21(1):43-50 - PubMed
  24. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005 Sep;30(3):217-32 - PubMed

Publication Types