Display options
Share it on

Comput Phys Commun. 2010 Dec 01;181(12):2001-2007. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.08.029.

A model for Structure and Thermodynamics of ssDNA and dsDNA Near a Surface: a Coarse Grained Approach.

Computer physics communications

J Ambia-Garrido, Arnold Vainrub, B Montgomery Pettitt

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics and Department of Chemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.

PMID: 20957064 PMCID: PMC2955266 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.08.029

Abstract

New methods based on surfaces or beads have allowed measurement of properties of single DNA molecules in very accurate ways. Theoretical coarse grained models have been developed to understand the behavior of single stranded and double stranded DNA. These models have been shown to be accurate and relatively simple for very short systems of 6-8 base pairs near surfaces. Comparatively less is known about the influence of a surface on the secondary structures of longer molecules important to many technologies. Surface fields due to either applied potentials and/or dielectric boundaries are not in current surface mounted coarse grained models. To gain insight into longer and surface mounted sequences we parameterized a discretized worm-like chain model. Each link is considered a sphere of 6 base pairs in length for dsDNA, and 1.5 bases for ssDNA (requiring an always even number of spheres). For this demonstration of the model, the chain is tethered to a surface by a fixed length, non-interacting 0.536 nm linker. Configurational sampling was achieved via Monte-Carlo simulation. Our model successfully reproduces end to end distance averages from experimental results, in agreement with polymer theory and all atom simulations. Our average tilt results are also in agreement with all atom simulations for the case of dense systems.

References

  1. J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Sep 28;127(38):13227-31 - PubMed
  2. J Am Chem Soc. 2003 Jul 2;125(26):7798-9 - PubMed
  3. Science. 1996 Feb 9;271(5250):795-9 - PubMed
  4. Nature. 2003 Jan 23;421(6921):423-7 - PubMed
  5. Science. 1994 Sep 9;265(5178):1599-600 - PubMed
  6. Langmuir. 2008 Jul 15;24(14):7269-77 - PubMed
  7. Ann Hum Genet. 2009 Sep;73(Pt 5):502-13 - PubMed
  8. Biopolymers. 2004 Apr 5;73(5):570-8 - PubMed
  9. Biophys J. 1998 Jul;75(1):134-49 - PubMed
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Feb 21;103(8):2623-8 - PubMed
  11. J Chem Phys. 2007 Nov 21;127(19):195101 - PubMed
  12. Phys Rev Lett. 2007 Feb 23;98(8):088101 - PubMed
  13. Biophys J. 2004 Feb;86(2):718-30 - PubMed
  14. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002 Oct;66(4 Pt 1):041905 - PubMed
  15. Biophys J. 2004 Apr;86(4):2530-7 - PubMed
  16. Bioconjug Chem. 2002 Jan-Feb;13(1):104-9 - PubMed
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jun 10;94(12):6185-90 - PubMed
  18. Int J Numer Anal Model. 2009 Mar 8;6(3):474-488 - PubMed
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 8;105(14):5301-6 - PubMed
  20. Biopolymers. 2000 Dec;54(7):561-71 - PubMed
  21. J Phys Chem B. 2006 Aug 24;110(33):16393-6 - PubMed
  22. Biopolymers. 2004 Apr 5;73(5):614-20 - PubMed
  23. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2005;7:21-53 - PubMed
  24. Biopolymers. 2003 Feb;68(2):265-70 - PubMed
  25. Science. 1992 Nov 13;258(5085):1122-6 - PubMed
  26. J Chem Phys. 2007 Oct 14;127(14):144912 - PubMed
  27. BMC Genomics. 2008 Dec 18;9:613 - PubMed
  28. Biomol Eng. 2005 Dec;22(5-6):173-84 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support