Pediatrics. 2011 Jan;127(1):e47-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0298. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
Use of skeletal surveys to evaluate for physical abuse: analysis of 703 consecutive skeletal surveys.
Pediatrics
Shanna O Duffy, Janet Squires, Janet B Fromkin, Rachel P Berger
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
PMID: 21149429
PMCID: PMC4466842 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-0298
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The goals were to assess the use of the skeletal survey (SS) to evaluate for physical abuse in a large consecutive sample, to identify characteristics of children most likely to have unsuspected fractures, and to determine how often SS results influenced directly the decision to make a diagnosis of abuse.
METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study of a consecutive sample of children who underwent an SS at a single children's hospital over 4 years was performed. Data on demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, SS results, and effects of SS results on clinical diagnoses were collected. A positive SS result was defined as a SS which identified a previously unsuspected fracture(s).
RESULTS: Of the 703 SSs, 10.8% yielded positive results. Children <6 months of age, children with an apparent life-threatening event or seizure, and children with suspected abusive head trauma had the highest rates of positive SS results. Of children with positive SS results, 79% had ≥1 healing fracture.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to date to describe the use of the SS. Almost 11% of SS results were positive. The SS results influenced directly the decision to make a diagnosis of abuse for 50% of children with positive SS results. These data, combined with the high morbidity rates for missed abuse and the large proportion of children with healing fractures detected through SS, suggest that broader use of SS, particularly for high-risk populations, may be warranted.
References
- Pediatrics. 2009 May;123(5):1430-5 - PubMed
- Pediatrics. 2005 Apr;115(4):885-93 - PubMed
- Child Abuse Negl. 2004 Oct;28(10):1099-111 - PubMed
- Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):206-10 - PubMed
- Pediatrics. 1997 Mar;99(3):371-5 - PubMed
- Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Apr;22(4):211-4 - PubMed
- Theor Med Bioeth. 2004;25(4):277-310 - PubMed
- Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Dec;24(12):816-21 - PubMed
- Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(1):60-6 - PubMed
- J Neurosurg. 2005 Jul;103(1 Suppl):61-8 - PubMed
- Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Apr;30(4):345-56 - PubMed
- Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):325-32 - PubMed
- Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2008 Nov;47(9):912-8 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2003 Aug 6;290(5):621-6 - PubMed
- Pediatrics. 2005 Jul;116(1):e5-12 - PubMed
- Dev Neurosci. 2006;28(4-5):327-35 - PubMed
- Radiology. 1983 Feb;146(2):377-81 - PubMed
- J Trauma. 2004 Dec;57(6):1189-98; discussion 1198 - PubMed
- J Clin Forensic Med. 2006 Feb;13(2):55-9 - PubMed
- Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):e247-52 - PubMed
- JAMA. 1999 Feb 17;281(7):621-6 - PubMed
- Pediatrics. 1984 Dec;74(6):1075-8 - PubMed
- Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):125-31 - PubMed
- Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Apr;22(4):245-6 - PubMed
- Am J Emerg Med. 2001 Mar;19(2):122-4 - PubMed
- Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul-Aug;17(4):648-53 - PubMed
- Am J Dis Child. 1990 Jan;144(1):58-60 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Publication Types
Grant support