Display options
Share it on

Semin Intervent Radiol. 2005 Dec;22(4):271-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-925553.

Hepatic perfusion and hemodynamic effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.

Seminars in interventional radiology

Eric M Walser, Michael Nguyen

Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.

PMID: 21326705 PMCID: PMC3036297 DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-925553

Abstract

The liver depends on a dual blood supply from the hepatic artery and the portal vein. The normal liver receives 70% portal flow and 30% hepatic arterial flow, with most arterial blood feeding the biliary tree. As cirrhosis robs the liver of its regenerative capacity, the portal flow decreases and intrahepatic portosystemic shunting increases with a variable increase in arterial flow across arterioportal shunts. This compensation mechanism attempts to reperfuse remaining sinusoids. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) or surgical portosystemic shunts may acutely diminish portal perfusion further, leading to hepatic failure. Small-diameter TIPS or surgical shunts reduce the incidence of complications by preserving nutritive portal flow. Although the inverse relationship of arterial and portal flow is physiologically valid, there is individual variation in the ability to substitute one blood supply for another. This variability may result from anatomic or functional factors influencing the flow across arterioportal shunts. Hepatic perfusion curves derived from enhanced imaging studies can subtype cirrhotic patients into favorable versus unfavorable perfusion patterns. Patients with high arterial flow to the liver or patients with retained portal-type flow curves have better survival and morbidity compared with those patients with unfavorable flow manifest by diminished arterial-type curves on hepatic perfusion analysis.

Keywords: Portal vein flow dynamics; liver blood supply; liver cirrhosis; portal hypertension; portosystemic shunts

References

  1. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1980;351(1):23-37 - PubMed
  2. Rofo. 1977 Jan;126(1):47-52 - PubMed
  3. Cancer. 1967 Jun;20(6):1015-22 - PubMed
  4. Hepatology. 2005 May;41(5):956-67 - PubMed
  5. Radiographics. 1997 Mar-Apr;17(2):337-48 - PubMed
  6. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 Apr;16(4):449-55 - PubMed
  7. Radiology. 1982 Mar;142(3):581-90 - PubMed
  8. Clin Nucl Med. 1996 Feb;21(2):132-5 - PubMed
  9. Hepatology. 2000 Apr;31(4):864-71 - PubMed
  10. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1991 May-Jun;14(3):158-62 - PubMed
  11. Hepatology. 1994 Jan;19(1):129-32 - PubMed
  12. J Clin Invest. 1980 Jun;65(6):1388-97 - PubMed
  13. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):1030-1 - PubMed
  14. J Hepatol. 1996 Jul;25(1):106-8 - PubMed
  15. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000 Jul-Aug;11(7):913-8 - PubMed
  16. Am J Clin Pathol. 1952 Aug;22(8):717-29 - PubMed
  17. Surgery. 1988 Aug;104(2):335-42 - PubMed
  18. J Surg Res. 1981 Dec;31(6):463-8 - PubMed
  19. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996 Mar-Apr;7(2):263-7 - PubMed
  20. Radiology. 1997 Feb;202(2):306-14 - PubMed
  21. Acta Radiol. 1989 Jul-Aug;30(4):419-25 - PubMed
  22. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Nov;12(11):1279-84 - PubMed
  23. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1993 Nov-Dec;4(6):759-66 - PubMed
  24. Am J Pathol. 1959 Sep-Oct;35:909-41 - PubMed
  25. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Oct;14(10):1251-7 - PubMed

Publication Types