Display options
Share it on

Environ Fluid Mech (Dordr). 2010;10(4):471-489. doi: 10.1007/s10652-009-9163-2.

A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING REGIONAL-SCALE NUMERICAL PHOTOCHEMICAL MODELING SYSTEMS.

Environmental fluid mechanics (Dordrecht, Netherlands : 2001)

Robin Dennis, Tyler Fox, Montse Fuentes, Alice Gilliland, Steven Hanna, Christian Hogrefe, John Irwin, S Trivikrama Rao, Richard Scheffe, Kenneth Schere, Douw Steyn, Akula Venkatram

Affiliations

  1. Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, RTP, NC 27711 USA.

PMID: 21461126 PMCID: PMC3066450 DOI: 10.1007/s10652-009-9163-2

Abstract

This paper discusses the need for critically evaluating regional-scale (~200-2000 km) three-dimensional numerical photochemical air quality modeling systems to establish a model's credibility in simulating the spatio-temporal features embedded in the observations. Because of limitations of currently used approaches for evaluating regional air quality models, a framework for model evaluation is introduced here for determining the suitability of a modeling system for a given application, distinguishing the performance between different models through confidence-testing of model results, guiding model development, and analyzing the impacts of regulatory policy options. The framework identifies operational, diagnostic, dynamic, and probabilistic types of model evaluation. Operational evaluation techniques include statistical and graphical analyses aimed at determining whether model estimates are in agreement with the observations in an overall sense. Diagnostic evaluation focuses on process-oriented analyses to determine whether the individual processes and components of the model system are working correctly, both independently and in combination. Dynamic evaluation assesses the ability of the air quality model to simulate changes in air quality stemming from changes in source emissions and/or meteorology, the principal forces that drive the air quality model. Probabilistic evaluation attempts to assess the confidence that can be placed in model predictions using techniques such as ensemble modeling and Bayesian model averaging. The advantages of these types of model evaluation approaches are discussed in this paper.

References

  1. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Jul;51(7):1060-72 - PubMed
  2. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2003 Jul;53(7):771 - PubMed
  3. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007 Jun;57(6):652-97 - PubMed
  4. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2005 Jan;55(1):13-9 - PubMed
  5. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Feb;51(2):283-306 - PubMed
  6. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008 Apr;58(4):580-8 - PubMed
  7. Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Sep 1;39(17):6739-48 - PubMed
  8. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2005 Nov;55(11):1694-708 - PubMed
  9. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008 Aug;58(8):1086-99 - PubMed
  10. Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Apr 1;43(7):2388-93 - PubMed
  11. Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Mar 1;41(5):1577-83 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support