Display options
Share it on

Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2011 Apr;6(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s11751-010-0100-1. Epub 2011 Jan 22.

Bipolar versus fixed-head hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

Strategies in trauma and limb reconstruction

Mostafa Abdelkhalek, Mohamed Abdelwahab, Ayman M Ali

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mansoura University, Dakahliya, Egypt.

PMID: 21589675 PMCID: PMC3058187 DOI: 10.1007/s11751-010-0100-1

Abstract

Between 2002 and 2007, fifty elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures were treated with hip replacement at Emergency Hospital, Mansoura University. Patients were randomly selected, 25 patients had either cemented or cementless bipolar prosthesis, and another 25 patients had either cemented or cementless fixed-head prosthesis. There were 34 women and 16 men with an average age of 63.5 years (range between 55 and 72 years). All patients were followed up both clinically and radiologically for an average 4.4 years (range between 2 and 6 years). At the final follow-up, the average Harris hip score among the bipolar group was 92 points (range between 72 and 97 points), while the fixed-head group was 84 points (range between 65 and 95 points). Radiologically, joint space narrowing more than 2 mm was found in only 8% (2 patients) among the bipolar group, and in 28% (7 patients) of the fixed-head group. Through the follow-up period, total hip replacement was needed in two cases of the bipolar group and seven cases of the fixed-head group. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty offered a better range of movement with less pain and more stability than the fixed-head hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures.

Keywords: Arthroplasty; Femoral neck fractures; Hip prosthesis

References

  1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Feb;(251):20-5 - PubMed
  2. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Oct;(152):147-57 - PubMed
  3. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Feb;(299):212-9 - PubMed
  4. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Sep;72(5):788-93 - PubMed
  5. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992 Dec;63(6):648-52 - PubMed
  6. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976 Aug;58(3):279-86 - PubMed
  7. Injury. 1993 Apr;24(4):231-5 - PubMed
  8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 May;(218):63-7 - PubMed
  9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 May;(278):121-7 - PubMed
  10. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jun;(141):17-27 - PubMed
  11. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972 Jan-Feb;82:14-23 - PubMed
  12. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Mar;(348):67-71 - PubMed
  13. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Oct;(152):198-201 - PubMed
  14. Orthopedics. 1985 Apr;8(4):460-7 - PubMed
  15. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Feb;(251):7-19 - PubMed
  16. J Trauma. 1972 Sep;12(9):799-806 - PubMed
  17. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983 Nov;65(5):544-7 - PubMed
  18. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979 Dec;61(8):1167-74 - PubMed
  19. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 May;78(3):391-4 - PubMed
  20. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2(4):327-41 - PubMed
  21. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63-B(3):357-61 - PubMed
  22. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987 Nov;69(5):761-4 - PubMed
  23. J Postgrad Med. 1996 Apr-Jun;42(2):33-8 - PubMed
  24. J Orthop Trauma. 2002 May;16(5):317-22 - PubMed
  25. J South Orthop Assoc. 1999 Winter;8(4):249-53 - PubMed

Publication Types