Display options
Share it on

Pers Relatsh. 2011 Jun 01;18(2):198-223. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01353.x.

Relational Uncertainty and Cortisol Responses to Hurtful and Supportive Messages from a Dating Partner.

Personal Relationships

Jennifer S Priem, Denise Haunani Solomon

Affiliations

  1. Pennsylvania State University, 2008 is a post-doctoral fellow in the School of Human Ecology at the University of Texas at Austin.

PMID: 21686068 PMCID: PMC3113611 DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01353.x

Abstract

This paper evaluates theoretical claims linking relational uncertainty about a relationship partner to experiences of stress during interactions with that partner. Two observational studies were conducted to evaluate the association between relational uncertainty and salivary cortisol in the context of hurtful and supportive interactions. In Study 1, participants (N = 89) engaged in a conversation about core traits or values with a partner, who was trained to be hurtful. In Study 2, participants (N = 89) received supportive messages after completing a series of stressful tasks and receiving negative performance feedback. As predicted, partner uncertainty was associated with greater cortisol reactivity to the hurtful interaction in Study 1. Contrary to expectations, Study 1 results also indicated that self uncertainty was associated with less cortisol reactivity, when self, partner, and relationship uncertainty were tested in the same model. Study 2 revealed that relational uncertainty dampened cortisol reactions to performing poorly on tasks while the partner observed. As predicted, Study 2 also found that partner uncertainty was associated with less cortisol recovery after the supportive interaction, but neither self nor relationship uncertainty was associated with rate of cortisol change during the recovery period.

References

  1. Endocr Rev. 2000 Feb;21(1):55-89 - PubMed
  2. Psychol Bull. 2004 Jul;130(4):601-30 - PubMed
  3. Horm Behav. 2006 Mar;49(3):346-52 - PubMed
  4. Neuropsychobiology. 1989;22(3):150-69 - PubMed
  5. Psychosom Med. 1995 Jan-Feb;57(1):23-31 - PubMed
  6. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Jun;29(6):713-25 - PubMed
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 2;93(7):3043-7 - PubMed
  8. Trends Immunol. 2003 Aug;24(8):444-8 - PubMed
  9. J Behav Med. 2006 Aug;29(4):317-25 - PubMed
  10. J Behav Med. 2004 Jun;27(3):233-54 - PubMed
  11. Psychol Bull. 1996 May;119(3):488-531 - PubMed
  12. Health Psychol. 1996 Mar;15(2):135-48 - PubMed
  13. J Behav Med. 2001 Aug;24(4):361-82 - PubMed
  14. Horm Behav. 2002 Mar;41(2):195-202 - PubMed
  15. Psychosom Med. 2001 May-Jun;63(3):493-501 - PubMed
  16. Biol Psychol. 1996 Mar 8;43(1):69-84 - PubMed
  17. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005 Nov;30(10):1010-6 - PubMed
  18. Am J Community Psychol. 1984 Jun;12(3):321-36 - PubMed
  19. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1994;59(2-3):108-34 - PubMed
  20. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Mar;80(3):472-88 - PubMed
  21. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:30-47 - PubMed
  22. Science. 2003 Oct 10;302(5643):290-2 - PubMed
  23. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 May 1;840:33-44 - PubMed
  24. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005 Oct;30(9):846-56 - PubMed
  25. Biol Psychol. 1987 Oct;25(2):135-51 - PubMed
  26. Psychol Bull. 2004 May;130(3):355-91 - PubMed
  27. Int J Behav Med. 2002;9(3):243-62 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support