Display options
Cite
Brown J, Fleming R, Aristzabel J, et al. Does pelvic exam in the emergency department add useful information?. West J Emerg Med. 2011;12(2):208-12
Brown, J., Fleming, R., Aristzabel, J., & Gishta, R. (2011). Does pelvic exam in the emergency department add useful information?. The western journal of emergency medicine, 12(2), 208-12.
Brown, Jeremy, et al. "Does pelvic exam in the emergency department add useful information?." The western journal of emergency medicine vol. 12,2 (2011): 208-12.
Brown J, Fleming R, Aristzabel J, Gishta R. Does pelvic exam in the emergency department add useful information?. West J Emerg Med. 2011 May;12(2):208-12. PMID: 21691528; PMCID: PMC3099609.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

West J Emerg Med. 2011 May;12(2):208-12.

Does pelvic exam in the emergency department add useful information?.

The western journal of emergency medicine

Jeremy Brown, Rita Fleming, Jamie Aristzabel, Rocksolana Gishta

Affiliations

  1. The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.

PMID: 21691528 PMCID: PMC3099609

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Physicians are taught that the pelvic exam is a key part of the evaluation of a woman presenting with abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding. However, the exam is time consuming and invasive, and its use in the emergency department (ED) has not been prospectively evaluated. We evaluated how often the findings of the pelvic exam changed management in a cohort of consecutive female patients presenting with acute abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding.

METHODS: We enrolled women who required a pelvic exam together with the providers caring for them in an academic ED from September 2004 to August 2005. We collected the results of the general history and physical exam. The provider was asked to predict the findings of the pelvic exam, and these were compared with the actual findings of the exam.

RESULTS: One hundred eighty-three patients were prospectively entered into the study. When compared with predicted findings, the pelvic exam was as expected in 131 patients (72%). In a further 40 patients (22%), the findings of the pelvic exam were not as predicted, but resulted in no change in the clinical plan. In 12 cases (6%) the exam revealed a finding that was both unexpected and changed the clinical plan. Only one of these patients was admitted. Of the 24 patients who were admitted, four had a pelvic exam that revealed unexpected results, but only one of these cases caused the physician to change the care planned for the patient.

CONCLUSION: In 94% of women with acute abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding, the results of the pelvic exam were either predictable or had no effect on the clinical plan. This suggests that there may be a subset of women with abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding in whom a pelvic exam may safely be deferred.

References

  1. West J Med. 2001 Oct;175(4):240-4; discussion 244-5 - PubMed
  2. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 28;356(26):e26 - PubMed
  3. JOGN Nurs. 1981 Mar-Apr;10(2):104-7 - PubMed
  4. Am J Emerg Med. 1999 Nov;17(7):635-7 - PubMed
  5. Women Health. 1992;18(2):41-53 - PubMed
  6. J Pediatr. 1986 Feb;108(2):312-7 - PubMed
  7. CJEM. 2003 Mar;5(2):120-2 - PubMed
  8. BMJ. 2006 Jul 22;333(7560):171 - PubMed
  9. Fam Pract. 1997 Apr;14(2):148-52 - PubMed
  10. CMAJ. 1992 Dec 1;147(11):1671-8 - PubMed
  11. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Oct;96(4):593-8 - PubMed
  12. Am J Emerg Med. 2003 May;21(3):205-7 - PubMed
  13. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Mar;33(3):283-90 - PubMed

Publication Types