Display options
Share it on

Int J Dent. 2011;2011:694759. doi: 10.1155/2011/694759. Epub 2011 Jul 03.

Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitudes about Research Ethics among Dental Faculty in the Middle East: A Pilot Study.

International journal of dentistry

Hadir F El-Dessouky, Amr M Abdel-Aziz, Chadi Ibrahim, Malini Moni, Reham Abul Fadl, Henry Silverman

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.

PMID: 21754933 PMCID: PMC3132601 DOI: 10.1155/2011/694759

Abstract

Objective. To assess the knowledge, awareness, and attitudes of dental faculty regarding research ethics and research ethics committees (RECs). Design. Through convenience sampling, we distributed a survey to academics at dental faculties at two universities in the Middle East. We used descriptive, chi-square, and logistic regression statistics to analyze the data. Results. Our response rate was 62.5%. A large majority (>90%) held positive attitudes towards RECs; however, almost half (44.0%) thought that RECs would delay research. Less than half (36.8%) had received prior training in research ethics, and the average score they achieved on the questions on research ethics was only 40.2%. Most (>90%), however, were favorable towards research ethics education. Finally, some faculty held attitudes regarding certain research ethics practices that were not optimal. Conclusions. We conclude that among the dental faculties participating in our study, there is broad-based acceptance of RECs and training in research ethics, while there are knowledge gaps in research ethics. We recommend further studies to determine the generalizability of our findings to other institutions.

References

  1. BMC Med Ethics. 2008 Jan 24;9:1 - PubMed
  2. Sci Eng Ethics. 1996 Jan;2(1):89-114 - PubMed
  3. Nat Med. 2007 Jul;13(7):763 - PubMed
  4. BMC Med Ethics. 2005 Oct 20;6:E10 - PubMed
  5. Glob Public Health. 2009;4(1):82-93; quiz 94-5 - PubMed
  6. BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Jun 28;11:12 - PubMed
  7. J Allied Health. 2008 Winter;37(4):221-4 - PubMed
  8. J Surg Res. 1995 Feb;58(2):247-51 - PubMed
  9. J Dent Res. 1996 Feb;75(2):845-55 - PubMed
  10. J R Soc Med. 2009 May;102(5):195-8 - PubMed
  11. Sci Eng Ethics. 1998 Oct;4(4):487-98 - PubMed
  12. Acad Med. 1992 Nov;67(11):769-75 - PubMed
  13. Dev World Bioeth. 2009 Aug;9(2):88-96 - PubMed
  14. Dev World Bioeth. 2009 Dec;9(3):149-56 - PubMed
  15. BMC Med Ethics. 2007 Jan 25;8:1 - PubMed
  16. Hastings Cent Rep. 2008 Mar-Apr;38(2):14-8 - PubMed
  17. BMC Med Ethics. 2009 Aug 01;10:11 - PubMed
  18. Account Res. 2005 Jul-Sep;12(3):193-206 - PubMed
  19. J Dent Res. 1994 Nov;73(11):1766-72 - PubMed
  20. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(2):114-20 - PubMed
  21. J Med Ethics. 1998 Aug;24(4):257-62 - PubMed
  22. Nurs Ethics. 2004;11(4):394-9 - PubMed
  23. IRB. 2006 Mar-Apr;28(2):1-9 - PubMed
  24. Bull Med Ethics. 2002 Oct;(182):17-23 - PubMed
  25. J R Soc Med. 2007 Feb;100(2):101-4 - PubMed
  26. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2005;80(1-2):203-32 - PubMed
  27. Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):838-45 - PubMed
  28. Nature. 2005 Jun 9;435(7043):737-8 - PubMed
  29. Science. 2008 Oct 10;322(5899):214-6 - PubMed
  30. PLoS One. 2008 May 07;3(5):e2094 - PubMed
  31. J Med Ethics. 2000 Apr;26(2):131-6 - PubMed
  32. Dev World Bioeth. 2007 Dec;7(3):143-8 - PubMed
  33. J Dent Res. 2010 Dec;89(12):1364-7 - PubMed
  34. PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support