Display options
Cite
Leonard SH, Deane GD, Gutmann MP. Household and farm transitions in environmental context. Popul Environ. 2011;32(4):287-317doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0118-9.
Leonard, S. H., Deane, G. D., & Gutmann, M. P. (2011). Household and farm transitions in environmental context. Population and environment, 32(4), 287-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0118-9
Leonard, Susan Hautaniemi, et al. "Household and farm transitions in environmental context." Population and environment vol. 32,4 (2011): 287-317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0118-9
Leonard SH, Deane GD, Gutmann MP. Household and farm transitions in environmental context. Popul Environ. 2011 Jun 01;32(4):287-317. doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0118-9. PMID: 21643468; PMCID: PMC3105790.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Popul Environ. 2011 Jun 01;32(4):287-317. doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0118-9.

Household and farm transitions in environmental context.

Population and environment

Susan Hautaniemi Leonard, Glenn D Deane, Myron P Gutmann

Affiliations

  1. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

PMID: 21643468 PMCID: PMC3105790 DOI: 10.1007/s11111-010-0118-9

Abstract

Recent debate in the literature on population, environment, and land use questions the applicability of theory that patterns of farm extensification and intensification correspond to the life course of farmers and to the life cycle of farm families. This paper extends the debate to the agricultural development of the United States Great Plains region, using unique data from 1875 to 1930 that link families to farms over time in 25 environmentally diverse Kansas townships. Results of multilevel statistical modeling indicate that farmer's age, household size, and household structure are simultaneously related to both the extent of farm operations and the intensity of land use, taking into account local environmental conditions and time trends as Kansas was settled and developed. These findings validate farm- and life cycle theories and offer support for intergenerational motivations for farm development that include both daughters and sons. Environmental variation in aridity was a key driver of farm structure.

References

  1. Hist Fam. 2001;6(1):51-67 - PubMed
  2. Glob Environ Change. 2008 Feb;18(1):38-53 - PubMed
  3. Agric Hist. 2009;83(3):352-83 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support