Display options
Share it on

J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011 Apr;4(2):207-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.82207.

The effects of blood pressure on rebleeding when using ExcelArrest™ in a porcine model of lethal femoral injury.

Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock

Hayong Hirst, John Brinkman, Amy Beasley, Richard Crocker, Joseph O'Sullivan

Affiliations

  1. William Beaumont Army Medical Center, Ft Bliss, El Paso, TX, USA.

PMID: 21769207 PMCID: PMC3132360 DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.82207

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled hemorrhage is one of the leading causes of death in both combat and civilian trauma. This study was designed to compare the arterial blood pressures at which rebleeding occurred when a hemostatic agent, ExcelArrest™, was used compared with a standard pressure dressing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a prospective, experimental, and mixed research design. Swine were assigned to one of two groups: ExcelArrest™ (n=5) or a control consisting of standard pressure dressings (n=5). Investigators generated a complex groin injury. The femoral artery and vein were transected and allowed to bleed for 60 s in each pig. After 60 s, ExcelArrest™ was poured into the wound. The control group underwent the same procedures, but without treatment with the hemostatic agent. After 5 min of direct pressure, a standard pressure dressing was applied. After 30 min, dressings were removed and the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was increased incrementally using intravenous phenylephrine until rebleeding occurred.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A multivariate ANOVA and a least significant difference were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS: ExcelArrest™ was more effective in preventing rebleeding compared to a standard pressure dressing (P<0.05). The means and standard deviations in mmHg for SBP and mean arterial pressure (MAP) for rebleeding were as follows: ExcelArrest™ (SBP=206.4, SD±11.6; MAP=171.4, SD±12.5); for the control group (SBP=89.40±3.58, MAP=58.60±12.86).

CONCLUSIONS: ExcelArrest™ was more effective in preventing rebleeding compared to the standard dressing with elevated blood pressures. There may be protective benefits in using this hemostatic agent against elevated blood pressures provided by ExcelArrest™.

Keywords: Emergency room; hemorrhage; hemostasis; porcine; trauma

References

  1. Surgery. 1991 Sep;110(3):529-36 - PubMed
  2. J Trauma. 2007 Jun;62(6 Suppl):S39-40 - PubMed
  3. J Trauma. 2008 Feb;64(2 Suppl):S28-37; discussion S37 - PubMed
  4. Mil Med. 2005 Jan;170(1):63-9 - PubMed
  5. J Trauma. 2010 Feb;68(2):269-78 - PubMed
  6. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002 Dec;8(6):549-50 - PubMed
  7. Crit Care Med. 2001 Jun;29(6):1261-7 - PubMed
  8. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Jan-Mar;6(1):81-91 - PubMed
  9. J Trauma. 2007 Aug;63(2):276-83; discussion 283-4 - PubMed
  10. Anesthesiology. 2000 Nov;93(5):1231-7 - PubMed
  11. J Biosoc Sci. 2008 Jul;40(4):481-503 - PubMed
  12. J Trauma. 2009 Apr;66(4 Suppl):S129-37 - PubMed
  13. Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):217-28 - PubMed
  14. Surg Clin North Am. 1973 Dec;53(6):1341-66 - PubMed
  15. J Trauma. 1998 Sep;45(3):545-9 - PubMed
  16. J Trauma. 2000 Sep;49(3):515-28; discussion 528-9 - PubMed
  17. AANA J. 2010 Jun;78(3):230-6 - PubMed
  18. J Trauma. 2003 Jan;54(1):177-82 - PubMed

Publication Types