Display options
Share it on

Urol Ann. 2011 Sep;3(3):119-26. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.84954.

Long-term prognostic value of the combination of EORTC risk group calculator and molecular markers in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with intravesical Bacille Calmette-Guérin.

Urology annals

Sultan S Alkhateeb, Mischel Neill, Sas Bar-Moshe, Bas Van Rhijn, David M Kakiashvili, Neil Fleshner, Michael Jewett, Michel Petein, Claude Schulman, Sally Hanna, Peter J Bostrom, Thierry Roumeguere, Shahrokh F Shariat, Sandrine Rorive, Alexandre R Zlotta

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

PMID: 21976923 PMCID: PMC3183702 DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.84954

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term prognostic value of the combination of the EORTC risk calculator and proapoptotic, antiapoptotic, proliferation, and invasiveness molecular markers in predicting the outcome of intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treated with intravesical Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 42 patients accrued prospectively presenting with intermediate- to high-risk NMIBC (high-grade T1 tumors or multiple rapidly recurrent tumors refractory to intravesical chemotherapy) treated with transurethral resection (TUR) and BCG. TUR samples were analyzed for the molecular markers p53, p21 waf1/cip, Bcl-2, CyclinD1, and metallothionein 9 (MMP9) using immunohistochemistry. Frequency of positivity, measured as a percentage, was assessed alone or in combination with EORTC risk calculator, for interaction with outcome in terms of recurrence and progression using univariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS: Median follow-up was 88 months (mean, 99; range, 14-212 months). The overall recurrence rate was 61.9% and progression rate was 21.4%. In univariate analysis, CyclinD1 and EORTC risk groups were significantly associated with recurrence (P value 0.03 and 0.02, respectively), although none of the markers showed a correlation to progression. In combining EORTC risk groups to markers expression status, high-risk group associated with positive MMP9, Bcl-2, CyclinD1, or p21 was significantly correlated to tumor recurrence (log rank P values <0.001, 0.03, 0.02, and 0.006, respectively) and when associated with positive MMP9 or p21, it was significantly correlated to progression (log rank P values 0.01 and 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSION: Molecular markers have a long-term prognostic value when combined with EORTC scoring system and they may be used to improve the predictive accuracy of currently existing scoring system. Larger series are needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords: BCG; Bcl-2; EORTC; bladder cancer; cyclinD1; high risk; long-term response; metallothionein 9; p21; p53; waf1/cip

References

  1. J Urol. 1997 Feb;157(2):492-8 - PubMed
  2. Acta Oncol. 1998;37(7-8):715-20 - PubMed
  3. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 15;22(6):1014-24 - PubMed
  4. BJU Int. 2010 Mar;105(5):608-13 - PubMed
  5. J Urol. 1996 Feb;155(2):477-82 - PubMed
  6. J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):1964-70 - PubMed
  7. J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):78-84; discussion 84 - PubMed
  8. Lancet Oncol. 2005 Sep;6(9):678-86 - PubMed
  9. Eur Urol. 2002 Feb;41(2):182-8; discussion 188-9 - PubMed
  10. J Urol. 2002 Apr;167(4):1573-83 - PubMed
  11. Int J Cancer. 2002 Feb 10;97(5):671-8 - PubMed
  12. Urology. 2006 Mar;67(3):530-5 - PubMed
  13. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 15;22(6):1007-13 - PubMed
  14. Eur Urol. 2004 May;45(5):606-12 - PubMed
  15. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2008 Sep;(218):185-90 - PubMed
  16. Br J Cancer. 2009 Apr 21;100(8):1219-29 - PubMed
  17. Hum Pathol. 2006 Dec;37(12):1568-76 - PubMed
  18. J Urol. 2000 Jan;163(1):73-8 - PubMed
  19. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Feb;8(2):128-36 - PubMed
  20. J Pathol. 1999 May;188(1):44-50 - PubMed
  21. J Urol. 2000 Jun;163(6):1697-701 - PubMed
  22. J Urol. 1999 Jul;162(1):69-73 - PubMed
  23. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):90-5 - PubMed
  24. Nature. 2004 Nov 18;432(7015):316-23 - PubMed
  25. Clin Cancer Res. 2000 May;6(5):1854-64 - PubMed
  26. J Urol. 2000 Dec;164(6):2129-33 - PubMed
  27. Eur Urol. 2006 Mar;49(3):466-5; discussion 475-7 - PubMed
  28. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):481-7; discussion 487 - PubMed
  29. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2008 Jul 01;10:e19 - PubMed
  30. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):96-100; discussion 100 - PubMed
  31. Clin Exp Immunol. 1997 Jul;109(1):157-65 - PubMed
  32. J Urol. 1999 Mar;161(3):792-8 - PubMed
  33. Cancer Res. 1994 Jul 1;54(13):3391-5 - PubMed
  34. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Jul 15;90(14):1072-9 - PubMed
  35. Mod Pathol. 2007 Apr;20(4):445-59 - PubMed

Publication Types