Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2011 Sep;22(3):21-30.
A Cardiopulmonary Instructor's Perspective on a Standardized Patient Experience: Implications for Cardiopulmonary Physical Therapy Education.
Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal
Lawrence P Cahalin, Alycia Markowski, Mary Hickey, Lorna Hayward
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Northeastern University, Department of Physical Therapy Boston, MA.
PMID: 21886477
PMCID: PMC3163414
Abstract
PURPOSE: Standardized patients (SP) in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) curricula are increasingly used for students to practice developing clinical reasoning, communication, and professional skills in an authentic learning environment. The purposes of this article are to: (1) describe an instructional model that synthesized SPs, Internet-based communities of practice, and reflection to teach clinical reasoning in DPT students; and (2) a cardiovascular and pulmonary physical therapy (CPPT) instructor's perspective on the educational process and student clinical skill development.
SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS: The model, employed in a course: "Integrative Physical Therapy Practice," enabled the instructor to document student clinical performance and reasoning during an SP interaction. For students, clinical reasoning was illuminated through the model's assessment process. Data collected through the assessment process provided important feedback to the instructor on classroom instructional effectiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: Examination of student learning experiences enabled the instructor to consider: (1) key aspects of examination and management for persons with cardiovascular or pulmonary disorders, (2) methods for visualizing clinical reasoning, (3) the impact of teaching on student learning, and (4) strategies for teaching CPPT. More research is indicated to investigate pedagogy for the development of clinical reasoning in DPT students.
Keywords: cardiovascular; clinical reasoning; physical therapy education; pulmonary; reflection; standardized patient
References
- Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2007;4:Article 16 - PubMed
- Postgrad Med J. 2002 Jun;78(920):319-21 - PubMed
- Phys Ther. 1992 Dec;72(12):875-84 - PubMed
- Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28 - PubMed
- Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 Jun;12(3):259-70 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 28;355(13):1339-44 - PubMed
- J Allied Health. 2010 Spring;39(1):28-33 - PubMed
- J Allied Health. 2010 Fall;39(3):e97-104 - PubMed
- Phys Ther. 2000 Sep;80(9):896-903 - PubMed
- JAMA. 1993 Oct 13;270(14):1702-7 - PubMed
- Chest. 1996 Aug;110(2):325-32 - PubMed
- Acad Med. 1993 Jun;68(6):443-51; discussion 451-3 - PubMed
- J Allied Health. 2007 Fall;36(3):157-64 - PubMed
- Eur Heart J. 2000 Apr;21(7):540-9 - PubMed
- J Allied Health. 2009 Spring;38(1):E17-21 - PubMed
- Am J Psychol. 2002 Winter;115(4):609-29 - PubMed
- Chest. 2001 Jan;119(1):256-70 - PubMed
- Health Commun. 2009 Jan;24(1):21-32 - PubMed
- Phys Ther. 2009 May;89(5):430-42 - PubMed
- Eur Heart J. 2001 Mar;22(6):488-96 - PubMed
- J Allied Health. 1997 Fall;26(4):177-86 - PubMed
- J Dent Educ. 2002 Dec;66(12):1323-30 - PubMed
- Am Heart J. 1998 Sep;136(3):449-57 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Dec;20(12):1108-13 - PubMed
- Caduceus. 1997 Autumn;13(2):5-28 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2005 Sep 7;294(9):1172 - PubMed
- Phys Ther. 2010 Jan;90(1):75-88 - PubMed
- Phys Ther. 1990 Sep;70(9):566-73; discussion 573-7 - PubMed
Publication Types