Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2010 Nov 04;1:181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00181. eCollection 2010.

Spatially localized time shifts of the perceptual stream.

Frontiers in psychology

Hinze Hogendoorn, Frans A J Verstraten, Alan Johnston

Affiliations

  1. Helmholtz Institute, Experimental Psychology Division, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.

PMID: 21833242 PMCID: PMC3153791 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00181

Abstract

Visual events trigger representations in different locations and times in the brain. In experience, however, these various neural responses refer to a single unified cause. To investigate how representations might be brought into temporal alignment, we attempted to locally manipulate neural processing in such a way that identical, simultaneous sequences would appear temporally misaligned. After adaptation to a 20 Hz sequentially expanding and contracting concentric grating, a running clock presented in the adapted region of the visual field appeared advanced relative to an identical clock presented simultaneously in an unadapted region. No such effect was observed following 5-Hz adaptation. Clock time reports following an exogenous cue showed the same effect of adaptation on perceived time, demonstrating that the apparent temporal misalignment was not mediated by differences in target selection or allocation of attention. This effect was not mediated by the apparent speed of the adapted clock: a clock in a 20-Hz-adapted spatial location appeared slower than a clock in a 5-Hz-adapted location, rather than faster. Furthermore, reaction times for a clock-hand orientation discrimination task were the same following 5- and 20-Hz adaptation, indicating that neural processing latencies were not differentially affected. Altogether, these findings suggest that the fragmented perceptual stream might be actively brought into temporal alignment through adaptive local mechanisms operating in spatially segregated regions of the visual field.

Keywords: attention; flicker; temporal alignment; temporal binding; time perception

References

  1. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Jul;8(7):950-4 - PubMed
  2. Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1314-29 - PubMed
  3. Vision Res. 1981;21(3):337-45 - PubMed
  4. Nature. 1997 Jan 23;385(6614):308 - PubMed
  5. Curr Biol. 2001 Jun 5;11(11):R427-30 - PubMed
  6. Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1293-313 - PubMed
  7. Science. 1999 Jun 25;284(5423):2177-81 - PubMed
  8. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Mar 22;264(1380):393-9 - PubMed
  9. J Vis. 2009 Oct 02;9(11):2.1-12 - PubMed
  10. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 May;13(5):216-21 - PubMed
  11. Science. 2000 Mar 17;287(5460):2036-8 - PubMed
  12. Vision Res. 2000;40(2):137-49 - PubMed
  13. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Jun 29;360(1458):1145-83 - PubMed
  14. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2059-68 - PubMed
  15. J Vis. 2006 Dec 12;6(12):1406-11 - PubMed
  16. J Vis. 2009 Aug 24;9(9):9.1-14 - PubMed
  17. Curr Biol. 2006 Mar 7;16(5):472-9 - PubMed
  18. Perception. 1990;19(6):705-43 - PubMed
  19. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jul;7(7):773-8 - PubMed
  20. Nat Neurosci. 2008 May;11(5):541-2 - PubMed
  21. Nature. 1994 Jul 28;370(6487):256-7 - PubMed
  22. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Jul;4(7):540-50 - PubMed
  23. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):799-832 - PubMed
  24. Vision Res. 2008 Aug;48(17):1852-8 - PubMed
  25. Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):364-79 - PubMed
  26. Curr Biol. 2002 Mar 5;12(5):359-68 - PubMed
  27. Nature. 1996 Nov 28;384(6607):358-60 - PubMed
  28. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001 Oct;36(2-3):96-107 - PubMed
  29. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 29;360(1456):733-50 - PubMed
  30. J Vis. 2009 May 29;9(5):30.1-15 - PubMed
  31. J Vis. 2009 Dec 08;9(13):9.1-14 - PubMed
  32. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 22;274(1623):2331-6 - PubMed

Publication Types