Display options
Share it on

Stud Mycol. 2011 Jun 30;69(1):19-30. doi: 10.3114/sim.2011.69.02.

Growth and hydrolase profiles can be used as characteristics to distinguish Aspergillus niger and other black aspergilli.

Studies in mycology

M Meijer, J A M P Houbraken, S Dalhuijsen, R A Samson, R P de Vries

PMID: 21892240 PMCID: PMC3161755 DOI: 10.3114/sim.2011.69.02

Abstract

Wild type Aspergillus niger isolates from different biotopes from all over the world were compared to each other and to the type strains of other black Aspergillus species with respect to growth and extracellular enzyme profiles. The origin of the A. niger isolate did not result in differences in growth profile with respect to monomeric or polymeric carbon sources. Differences were observed in the growth rate of the A. niger isolates, but these were observed on all carbon sources and not specific for a particular carbon source. In contrast, carbon source specific differences were observed between the different species. Aspergillus brasiliensis is the only species able to grow on D-galactose, and A. aculeatus had significantly better growth on Locus Bean gum than the other species. Only small differences were found in the extracellular enzyme profile of the A. niger isolates during growth on wheat bran, while large differences were observed in the profiles of the different black aspergilli. In addition, differences were observed in temperature profiles between the black Aspergillus species, but not between the A. niger isolates, demonstrating no isolate-specific adaptations to the environment.These data indicate that the local environment does not result in stable adaptations of A. niger with respect to growth profile or enzyme production, but that the potential is maintained irrespective of the environmental parameters. It also demonstrates that growth, extracellular protein and temperature profiles can be used for species identification within the group of black aspergilli.

References

  1. Biotechnol Lett. 2007 May;29(5):743-8 - PubMed
  2. Stud Mycol. 2007;59:11-7 - PubMed
  3. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2000 Jun 23;743(1-2):247-54 - PubMed
  4. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001 Dec;65(4):497-522, table of contents - PubMed
  5. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003 Mar;61(1):10-20 - PubMed
  6. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Apr;61(4):1323-30 - PubMed
  7. Mycol Res. 2004 Aug;108(Pt 8):919-25 - PubMed
  8. Stud Mycol. 2007;59:129-45 - PubMed
  9. Eur J Biochem. 2001 May;268(10):2982-90 - PubMed
  10. Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Feb;25(2):221-31 - PubMed
  11. Fungal Genet Biol. 2006 Jun;43(6):446-52 - PubMed
  12. Stud Mycol. 2011 Jun 30;69(1):1-17 - PubMed
  13. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2007 May;8(5):371-6 - PubMed
  14. Carbohydr Res. 2000 Oct 20;329(1):75-85 - PubMed
  15. Bioresour Technol. 2004 Jan;91(2):153-6 - PubMed
  16. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1999 Jan;63(1):206-9 - PubMed
  17. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jul;70(7):3954-9 - PubMed
  18. J Biosci Bioeng. 2002;93(1):9-14 - PubMed
  19. Med Mycol. 2006 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S17-21 - PubMed
  20. J Agric Food Chem. 2000 Oct;48(10):4929-36 - PubMed
  21. Stud Mycol. 2007;59:19-30 - PubMed
  22. Biochem J. 2004 Apr 15;379(Pt 2):375-83 - PubMed
  23. Mycoses. 2001 May;44(3-4):65-72 - PubMed
  24. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2003;48(5):581-4 - PubMed
  25. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2002 Mar 15;399(2):188-94 - PubMed
  26. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2005 Apr;87(3):195-203 - PubMed

Publication Types