Display options
Share it on

J Dent (Tehran). 2010;7(2):64-70. Epub 2010 Jun 30.

Assessment of Bond Strength between Metal Brackets and Non-Glazed Ceramic in Different Surface Treatment Methods.

Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran)

Ms Ahmad Akhoundi, M Rahmati Kamel, T Hooshmand, I Harririan, Mj Kharazi Fard, H Noroozi

Affiliations

  1. Associate Professor, Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

PMID: 21998777 PMCID: PMC3184746

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength between metal brackets and non-glazed ceramic with three different surface treatment methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two non-glazed ceramic disks were assigned into three groups. Group I and II specimens were etched with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid. Subsequently in group I, silane and adhesive were applied and in group II, bonding agent was used only. In group III, specimens were treated with 35% phosphoric acid and then silane and adhesive were applied. Brackets were bonded with light-cured composites. The specimens were stored in water in room temperature for 24 hours and then thermocycled 500 times between 5°C and 55°C.

RESULTS: The difference of tensile bond strength between groups I and III was not significant (P=0.999). However, the tensile bond strength of group II was significantly lower than groups I, and III (P<0.001). The adhesive remnant index scores between the three groups had statistically significant differences (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION: With the application of scotch bond multi-purpose plus adhesive, we can use phosphoric acid instead of hydrofluoric acid for bonding brackets to non-glazed ceramic restorations.

Keywords: Dental Porcelain; Orthodontic Brackets; Shear Strength

References

  1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Oct;100(4):357-61 - PubMed
  2. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Oct;72(4):355-9 - PubMed
  3. Br J Orthod. 1999 Dec;26(4):285-90 - PubMed
  4. J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Sep;25(9):699-705 - PubMed
  5. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 May;123(5):551-4 - PubMed
  6. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 May;73(5):464-70 - PubMed
  7. J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Sep;62(3):257-60 - PubMed
  8. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 May;123(5):540-6 - PubMed
  9. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Jan;89(1):66-9 - PubMed
  10. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Mar;111(3):297-300 - PubMed
  11. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Sep;108(3):322-9 - PubMed
  12. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 May;117(5):592-4 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Orthod. 2006 Feb;28(1):74-7 - PubMed
  14. Aust Orthod J. 2005 May;21(1):19-23 - PubMed
  15. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 May;111(5):498-501 - PubMed
  16. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Aug;106(2):167-74 - PubMed
  17. Am J Orthod. 1979 Jul;76(1):80-3 - PubMed
  18. J Prosthet Dent. 1973 Feb;29(21):228-30 - PubMed
  19. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Nov;94(5):421-5 - PubMed
  20. Am J Orthod. 1965 Dec;51(12):901-12 - PubMed
  21. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Feb;107(2):159-64 - PubMed
  22. Dent Mater. 2002 Mar;18(2):179-88 - PubMed
  23. J Dent Res. 1987 Sep;66(9):1460-5 - PubMed
  24. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jun;119(6):617-20 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Orthod. 2000 Feb;22(1):13-23 - PubMed
  26. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Sep;106(3):290-7 - PubMed
  27. Oper Dent. 1998 Sep-Oct;23(5):250-7 - PubMed
  28. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Sep;94(3):245-52 - PubMed
  29. J Prosthet Dent. 1982 Mar;47(3):338-9 - PubMed
  30. Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):451-6 - PubMed
  31. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Jul;30(7):758-64 - PubMed
  32. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Apr;109(4):420-30 - PubMed
  33. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Jul;106(1):10-21 - PubMed

Publication Types