Display options
Share it on

Cogn Neurodyn. 2010 Dec;4(4):367-76. doi: 10.1007/s11571-010-9131-z. Epub 2010 Sep 11.

Short term memory bowing effect is consistent with presentation rate dependent decay.

Cognitive neurodynamics

Eugen Tarnow

Affiliations

  1. 18-11 Radburn Road, Fair Lawn, NJ 07410 USA.

PMID: 22132046 PMCID: PMC2974100 DOI: 10.1007/s11571-010-9131-z

Abstract

I reanalyze the free recall data of Murdock, J Exp Psychol 64(5):482-488 (1962) and Murdock and Okada, J Verbal Learn and Verbal Behav 86:263-267 (1970) which show the famous bowing effect in which initial and recent items are recalled better than intermediate items (primacy and recency effects). Recent item recall probabilities follow a logarithmic decay with time of recall consistent with the tagging/retagging theory. The slope of the decay increases with increasing presentation rate. The initial items, with an effectively low presentation rate, decay with the slowest logarithmic slope, explaining the primacy effect. The finding that presentation rate limits the duration of short term memory suggests a basis for memory loss in busy adults, for the importance of slow music practice, for long term memory deficiencies for people with attention deficits who may be artificially increasing the presentation rates of their surroundings. A well-defined, quantitative measure of the primacy effect is introduced.

Keywords: Bowing effect; Endocytosis; Free recall; Presentation rate; Primacy effect; Priming; Short term memory; Synapse

References

  1. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Aug;12(8):1003-1010 - PubMed
  2. Surgery. 2005 Dec;138(6):1121-8; discussion 1128-9 - PubMed
  3. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Mar;35(2):317-33 - PubMed
  4. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Aug;3(8):617-28 - PubMed
  5. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Mar;133(1):83-100 - PubMed
  6. Cogn Neurodyn. 2009 Sep;3(3):263-9 - PubMed
  7. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):120-6 - PubMed
  8. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Sep;58:193-8 - PubMed
  9. Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):544-76 - PubMed
  10. Cell. 2009 Sep 4;138(5):947-60 - PubMed
  11. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;13(4):145-6; author reply 146-7 - PubMed
  12. J Neurosci. 1994 Feb;14(2):523-37 - PubMed
  13. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2002 Jun-Aug;20(3-5):225-36 - PubMed
  14. Cogn Neurodyn. 2008 Dec;2(4):347-53 - PubMed
  15. Psychol Bull. 2009 Jan;135(1):23-49 - PubMed
  16. J Neurosci. 2006 Jun 28;26(26):7071-81 - PubMed
  17. Physiology (Bethesda). 2007 Oct;22:320-7 - PubMed
  18. Physiol Rev. 2005 Jan;85(1):201-79 - PubMed
  19. Science. 2001 Nov 2;294(5544):1030-8 - PubMed
  20. Nat Neurosci. 2001 Feb;4(2):129-36 - PubMed
  21. J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 31;27(44):11793-802 - PubMed

Publication Types