Display options
Share it on

Toxicol Int. 2011 Aug;18:S20-9. doi: 10.4103/0971-6580.85882.

A multi-criteria decision analysis model to assess the safety of botanicals utilizing data on history of use.

Toxicology international

T Neely, B Walsh-Mason, P Russell, A Van Der Horst, S O'Hagan, P Lahorkar

Affiliations

  1. Safety and Environmental Assurance Center, Unilever, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire MK44 1LQ, UK.

PMID: 22025816 PMCID: PMC3199690 DOI: 10.4103/0971-6580.85882

Abstract

Botanicals (herbal materials and extracts) are widely used in traditional medicines throughout the world. Many have an extensive history of safe use over several hundreds of years. There is now a growing consumer interest in food and cosmetic products, which contain botanicals. There are many publications describing the safety assessment approaches for botanicals, based on the history of safe use. However, they do not define what constitutes a history of safe use, a decision that is ultimately a subjective one. The multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), is a model that has been developed, which assesses the safety of botanical ingredients using a history of use approach. The model evaluates the similarity of the botanical ingredient of interest to its historic counterpart - the comparator, the evidence supporting the history of use, and any evidence of concern. The assessment made is whether a botanical ingredient is as safe as its comparator botanical, which has a history of use. In order to establish compositional similarity between the botanical ingredient and its comparator, an analytical 'similarity scoring' approach has been developed. Applicability of the model is discussed with an example, Brahmi ( Bacopa monnieri).This evolution of the risk assessment of botanicals gives an objective, transparent, and transferable safety assessment approach.

Keywords: Botanicals; Brahmi; history of safe use; multi multi-criteria decision analysis; safety assessment; similarity score

References

  1. Phytother Res. 2008 Dec;22(12):1629-34 - PubMed
  2. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006 Jan 3;103(1):25-35 - PubMed
  3. J Altern Complement Med. 2008 Jul;14(6):707-13 - PubMed
  4. Life Sci. 2006 Mar 27;78(18):2033-8 - PubMed
  5. Sci Total Environ. 2008 Jan 15;389(1):71-86 - PubMed
  6. Food Chem Toxicol. 2003 Dec;41(12):1625-49 - PubMed
  7. Toxicology. 2004 May 20;198(1-3):213-20 - PubMed
  8. Toxicol Lett. 2004 Apr 1;149(1-3):187-95 - PubMed
  9. Risk Anal. 2006 Feb;26(1):61-78 - PubMed
  10. Phytochemistry. 2007 May;68(9):1248-54 - PubMed
  11. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2004 Dec 5;812(1-2):53-70 - PubMed
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Feb 15;97(4):1433-7 - PubMed
  13. Science. 2003 May 2;300(5620):740-1 - PubMed
  14. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2002 Nov;12(4):195-211 - PubMed
  15. Phytochemistry. 2005 Dec;66(23):2719-28 - PubMed

Publication Types