Display options
Share it on

Crit Care Res Pract. 2011;2011:631062. doi: 10.1155/2011/631062. Epub 2011 Oct 26.

Assessment of procalcitonin to predict outcome in hypothermia-treated patients after cardiac arrest.

Critical care research and practice

Pascal Stammet, Yvan Devaux, Francisco Azuaje, Christophe Werer, Christiane Lorang, Georges Gilson, Martin Max

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Luxembourg Medical Centre (CHL), 1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

PMID: 22110909 PMCID: PMC3205599 DOI: 10.1155/2011/631062

Abstract

Objective. Determine the potential of procalcitonin (PCT) to predict neurological outcome after hypothermia treatment following cardiac arrest. Methods. Retrospective analysis of patient data over a 2-year period. Mortality and neurological outcome of survivors were determined 6 months after cardiac arrest using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score. Results. Data from 53 consecutive patients were analyzed. Median age was 63 (54-71) and 79% were male. Twenty-seven patients had good outcome (CPC ≤ 2) whereas 26 had severe neurological sequelae or died (CPC 3-5). At 48 h, after regaining normothermia, PCT was significantly higher in patients with bad outcome compared to those with good outcome: 3.38 (1.10-24.48) versus 0.28 (0-0.75) ng/mL (P < 0.001). PCT values correlated with bad neurological outcome (r = 0.54, P = 0.00004) and predicted outcome with an area under the curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.96). A cutoff point of 1 ng/mL provided a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 81%. Above a PCT level of 16 ng/mL, no patient regained consciousness. PCT provided an additive value over simplified acute physiology score II. Conclusions. PCT might be an ancillary marker for outcome prediction after cardiac arrest treated by induced hypothermia.

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 21;346(8):557-63 - PubMed
  2. Lancet. 2004 Feb 21;363(9409):600-7 - PubMed
  3. Resuscitation. 2004 Dec;63(3):233-49 - PubMed
  4. Resuscitation. 2002 May;53(2):167-70 - PubMed
  5. Lancet. 1975 Mar 1;1(7905):480-4 - PubMed
  6. Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1695-9 - PubMed
  7. Circulation. 2002 Jul 30;106(5):562-8 - PubMed
  8. J Crit Care. 2009 Sep;24(3):453-7 - PubMed
  9. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Apr;40(4):376-81 - PubMed
  10. Circulation. 2008 Dec 2;118(23):2452-83 - PubMed
  11. Crit Care. 2007;11(3):R71 - PubMed
  12. Resuscitation. 2007 Apr;73(1):29-39 - PubMed
  13. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jan;36(1):92-9 - PubMed
  14. Resuscitation. 2009 Aug;80(8):876-80 - PubMed
  15. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb 15;171(4):388-416 - PubMed
  16. Stroke. 2007 Aug;38(8):2303-8 - PubMed
  17. Br J Pharmacol. 2010 Jan 1;159(2):253-64 - PubMed
  18. Neurology. 2006 Jul 25;67(2):203-10 - PubMed
  19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Aug 1;164(3):396-402 - PubMed
  20. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Aug;53(7):926-34 - PubMed
  21. Resuscitation. 2003 Oct;59(1):105-9 - PubMed
  22. Lancet. 2010 Feb 6;375(9713):463-74 - PubMed
  23. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 21;346(8):549-56 - PubMed
  24. Neurocrit Care. 2010 Apr;12(2):252-7 - PubMed
  25. Resuscitation. 2010 Oct;81(10):1305-52 - PubMed
  26. JAMA. 2004 Feb 18;291(7):870-9 - PubMed
  27. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar 1;177(5):498-505 - PubMed
  28. BMC Infect Dis. 2009 Apr 22;9:49 - PubMed
  29. Crit Care Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):2596-602 - PubMed
  30. Clin Chem. 2009 May;55(5):1043-4 - PubMed

Publication Types