Display options
Cite
Bande CR, Prashant MC, Sumbh B, et al. Prevalence, treatment and recurrence of odontogenic keratocyst in central India. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2010;9(2):146-9doi: 10.1007/s12663-010-0043-6.
Bande, C. R., Prashant, M. C., Sumbh, B., & Pandilwar, P. K. (2010). Prevalence, treatment and recurrence of odontogenic keratocyst in central India. Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 9(2), 146-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-010-0043-6
Bande, Chandrashekhar R, et al. "Prevalence, treatment and recurrence of odontogenic keratocyst in central India." Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery vol. 9,2 (2010): 146-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-010-0043-6
Bande CR, Prashant MC, Sumbh B, Pandilwar PK. Prevalence, treatment and recurrence of odontogenic keratocyst in central India. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2010 Jun;9(2):146-9. doi: 10.1007/s12663-010-0043-6. Epub 2010 Sep 22. PMID: 22190774; PMCID: PMC3244102.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2010 Jun;9(2):146-9. doi: 10.1007/s12663-010-0043-6. Epub 2010 Sep 22.

Prevalence, treatment and recurrence of odontogenic keratocyst in central India.

Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery

Chandrashekhar R Bande, M C Prashant, Bharat Sumbh, P K Pandilwar

Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sw. Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Waddhamana Road, Wanadongari, Higna, Nagpur, India.

PMID: 22190774 PMCID: PMC3244102 DOI: 10.1007/s12663-010-0043-6

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, sex predilection and treatment modalities of OKC in Central India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total 2900 patients were screened from various hospitals and centers. Age of patients and site of lesion was recorded. OKC was classified into initial, moderate and advanced depending on the radiological involvement and treatment modalities given with respect to the extent of the OKC.

RESULT: Total 49 patients were diagnosed with the presence of OKC. It was found that mostly it is common in 3rd and 4th decades, with the mean age 28 years in males and 31 years in females. The most common site of occurrence was angle of mandible and the ramus region. The treatment of OKC, on the basis of the radiographic classification, gives excellent results with minimum recurrences.

CONCLUSION: The most common age and site occurrence was relevant with that of previous studies (Browne, Br Dent J 128(5):225-231, 1970, Chen and Lin, Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi 2(9):601-607, 1986). This study concluded by considering multicentric incidence, prevalence of OKC in Central India, that the population should be screened for OKC. The screening should be done by clinical, radiological and histopathological. While screening all the parameters should be considered to diagnose and treat the patients for the prevention of morbidity.

Keywords: Odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) prevalence; Recurrence and Central India; Treatment

References

  1. J Oral Surg. 1969 May;27(5):323-30 - PubMed
  2. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988 Jul;66(1):145-53 - PubMed
  3. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1980;76(3):129-74 - PubMed
  4. J Oral Pathol. 1987 Feb;16(2):75-80 - PubMed
  5. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Mar;64(3):379-83 - PubMed
  6. Int J Oral Surg. 1982 Jun;11(3):175-82 - PubMed
  7. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973 Jan;35(1):21-7 - PubMed
  8. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent. 1995 Mar;37(1):33-40 - PubMed
  9. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Jun;48(6):593-9; discussion 599-600 - PubMed
  10. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976 Jul;42(1):54-72 - PubMed
  11. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1975 Sep;40(3):362-4 - PubMed
  12. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985 Jun;23(3):204-9 - PubMed
  13. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985 Mar;43(3):177-82 - PubMed
  14. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974 Apr;37(4):518-25 - PubMed
  15. J Oral Surg. 1969 Dec;27(12):931-8 - PubMed
  16. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1989 Jul;17(5):226-33 - PubMed
  17. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985 Jun;23(3):210-5 - PubMed
  18. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Aug;15(3):383-92 - PubMed
  19. Cell. 1992 Apr 3;69(1):111-7 - PubMed
  20. J Maxillofac Surg. 1981 Nov;9(4):228-36 - PubMed
  21. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Apr;25(2):124-9 - PubMed
  22. Laryngoscope. 1995 Jan;105(1):14-6 - PubMed
  23. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1978 Nov;6(6):296-9 - PubMed
  24. J Oral Pathol. 1987 Mar;16(3):124-8 - PubMed
  25. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1963;58:283-94 - PubMed
  26. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi. 1986 Sep;2(9):601-7 - PubMed
  27. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981 Jun;51(6):609-18 - PubMed
  28. Br Dent J. 1970 Mar 3;128(5):225-31 - PubMed
  29. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Jan;50(1):22-6 - PubMed
  30. J Can Dent Assoc. 2008 Mar;74(2):165-165h - PubMed
  31. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987 Dec;64(6):727-30 - PubMed
  32. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991 Sep;72(3):265-9 - PubMed
  33. Br Dent J. 1971 Sep 21;131(6):249-59 - PubMed
  34. Int J Oral Surg. 1979 Dec;8(6):412-20 - PubMed
  35. Br J Oral Surg. 1970 Nov;8(2):114-25 - PubMed
  36. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Aug;25(4):271-9 - PubMed
  37. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994 Mar;77(3):276-80 - PubMed
  38. Genomics. 1994 Sep 15;23(2):486-9 - PubMed
  39. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1988 Feb;17(1):25-8 - PubMed
  40. Medicine (Baltimore). 1987 Mar;66(2):98-113 - PubMed
  41. Br J Oral Surg. 1969 Jul;7(1):15-23 - PubMed
  42. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1988 May;16(4):184-95 - PubMed

Publication Types