Display options
Share it on

BMJ Open. 2012 Mar 15;2(2):e000657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000657. Print 2012.

Non-response in a nationwide follow-up postal survey in Finland: a register-based mortality analysis of respondents and non-respondents of the Health and Social Support (HeSSup) Study.

BMJ open

Sakari Suominen, Karoliina Koskenvuo, Lauri Sillanmäki, Jussi Vahtera, Katariina Korkeila, Mika Kivimäki, Kari J Mattila, Pekka Virtanen, Markku Sumanen, Päivi Rautava, Markku Koskenvuo

Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

PMID: 22422917 PMCID: PMC3307122 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000657

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine difference in mortality between postal survey non-respondents and respondents.

DESIGN: A prospective cohort study with baseline survey in 1998 and comprehensive linkage to national mortality registers until 2005, the Health and Social Support study.

SETTING: A population-based postal survey of the working-aged population in Finland in 1998.

PARTICIPANTS: The original random sample comprised 64 797 working-aged individuals in Finland (20-24, 30-34, 40-44, 50-54 years of age; 32 059 women and 32 716 men), yielding 25 898 (40.0%) responses in the baseline postal survey in 1998.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Registry-based primary causes of death encoded with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10).

RESULTS: In women, HR for total mortality was 1.75 (95% CI 1.40 to 2.19) times higher among the non-respondents compared with the respondents. In men, non-response was associated with a 1.41-fold (1.21-1.65) excess risk of total mortality. Non-response associated in certain age groups with deaths due to diseases in women and with deaths due to external causes in men. The most prominent excess mortality was seen for total mortality for both genders and for mortality due to external causes among men.

CONCLUSIONS: Postal surveys result in slight underestimation of illness prevalence.

References

  1. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(11):991-9 - PubMed
  2. Epidemiology. 2011 Nov;22(6):815-22 - PubMed
  3. Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;26(4):844-54 - PubMed
  4. Int J Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;38(3):831-7 - PubMed
  5. Fam Pract. 1998 Jun;15(3):261-3 - PubMed
  6. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(2):212-5 - PubMed
  7. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986 Jun;40(2):174-7 - PubMed
  8. Int J Epidemiol. 1990 Jun;19(2):284-9 - PubMed
  9. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Dec;44(4):316-20 - PubMed
  10. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Feb;125(2):329-39 - PubMed
  11. Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;26(5):1055-62 - PubMed
  12. Scand J Soc Med. 1988;16(2):101-4 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Public Health. 2005 Oct;15(5):528-35 - PubMed
  14. Alcohol Alcohol. 1986;21(3):251-6 - PubMed
  15. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997 Nov;51 Suppl 3:S19-24 - PubMed
  16. Public Health. 1995 Jul;109(4):267-73 - PubMed
  17. Eur J Epidemiol. 1999 Mar;15(3):293-9 - PubMed
  18. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;50(10):1129-36 - PubMed
  19. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Mar;45(1):81-5 - PubMed
  20. Alcohol Alcohol. 2003 Mar-Apr;38(2):128-34 - PubMed
  21. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989 Dec;43(4):369-74 - PubMed
  22. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(3):233-9 - PubMed

Publication Types