Display options
Share it on

Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:763181. doi: 10.1155/2012/763181. Epub 2012 Feb 20.

Relationship between Abdominal Pressure, Pulmonary Compliance, and Cardiac Preload in a Porcine Model.

Critical care research and practice

Joost Wauters, Piet Claus, Nathalie Brosens, Myles McLaughlin, Greet Hermans, Manu Malbrain, Alexander Wilmer

Affiliations

  1. Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

PMID: 22454767 PMCID: PMC3290811 DOI: 10.1155/2012/763181

Abstract

Rationale. Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) may compromise respiratory and cardiovascular function by abdomino-thoracic pressure transmission. We aimed (1) to study the effects of elevated IAP on pleural pressure, (2) to understand the implications for lung and chest wall compliances and (3) to determine whether volumetric filling parameters may be more accurate than classical pressure-based filling pressures for preload assessment in the setting of elevated IAP. Methods. In eleven pigs, IAP was increased stepwise from 6 to 30 mmHg. Hemodynamic, esophageal, and pulmonary pressures were recorded. Results. 17% (end-expiratory) to 62% (end-inspiratory) of elevated IAP was transmitted to the thoracic compartment. Respiratory system compliance decreased significantly with elevated IAP and chest wall compliance decreased. Central venous and pulmonary wedge pressure increased with increasing IAP and correlated inversely (r = -0.31) with stroke index (SI). Global end-diastolic volume index was unaffected by IAP and correlated best with SI (r = 0.52). Conclusions. Increased IAP is transferred to the thoracic compartment and results in a decreased respiratory system compliance due to decreased chest wall compliance. Volumetric filling parameters and transmural filling pressures are clearly superior to classical cardiac filling pressures in the assessment of cardiac preload during elevated IAP.

References

  1. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982 Aug;53(2):384-91 - PubMed
  2. Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1243-9, table of contents - PubMed
  3. Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1186-92 - PubMed
  4. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005 Aug;11(4):333-8 - PubMed
  5. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul 1;164(1):122-30 - PubMed
  6. Respir Care. 2000 Sep;45(9):1072-84 - PubMed
  7. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Feb 15;169(4):534-41 - PubMed
  8. J Trauma. 1995 Dec;39(6):1071-5 - PubMed
  9. Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1466-71 - PubMed
  10. Crit Care Med. 1989 Feb;17(2):118-21 - PubMed
  11. J Trauma. 1999 Jan;46(1):16-22 - PubMed
  12. Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4 Suppl):S285-95 - PubMed
  13. Anesthesiology. 1978 Jan;48(1):23-7 - PubMed
  14. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Jan;72(1):383-8 - PubMed
  15. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Oct;156(4 Pt 1):1082-91 - PubMed
  16. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Jan;49(1):84-91 - PubMed
  17. Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb;33(2):315-22 - PubMed
  18. Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;26(11):1801-6 - PubMed
  19. J Trauma. 2003 Oct;55(4):734-40 - PubMed
  20. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jul;158(1):3-11 - PubMed
  21. Acta Clin Belg. 2007;62 Suppl 1:78-88 - PubMed
  22. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005 Apr;11(2):156-71 - PubMed
  23. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1991 Jun;70(6):2611-8 - PubMed
  24. Ann Biomed Eng. 1987;15(3-4):331-46 - PubMed
  25. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Oct;21(5):650-4 - PubMed
  26. J Surg Res. 1981 Mar;30(3):249-55 - PubMed
  27. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Nov;32(11):1722-32 - PubMed
  28. Crit Care Med. 1997 Mar;25(3):496-503 - PubMed
  29. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jan;30(1):119-26 - PubMed
  30. Intensive Care Med. 2005 May;31(5):747-51 - PubMed
  31. Shock. 2005 Aug;24(2):153-8 - PubMed

Publication Types