Display options
Share it on

Oman J Ophthalmol. 2011 Sep;4(3):116-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-620X.91266.

Artiflex versus STAAR implantable contact lenses for correction of high myopia.

Oman journal of ophthalmology

Mohammad Ghoreishi, Amin Masjedi, Kobra Nasrollahi, Aminhossein Rahgozar, Keivan Jenab, Hamid Fesharaki

Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Persian Eye Clinic, Isfahan, Iran.

PMID: 22279398 PMCID: PMC3263163 DOI: 10.4103/0974-620X.91266

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare two phakic intraocular lenses, Artiflex and STAAR(®) implantable contact lens (ICL), in high myopia.

SETTING: Isfahan Ophthalmology Clinic, Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomized, prospective clinical trial study, 40 eyes of 20 patients who came to Isfahan ophthalmology clinic to correct their refractive error were examined. Artiflex was inserted in 20 eyes and ICL in the other 20 eyes. After 1 year, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and specular microscopy of corneal endothelium were assessed in both the groups.

RESULTS: In this study, there was no statistical difference between UCVA, BCVA, IOP, cataract incidence, contrast sensitivity, and specular microscopy, 1 year after surgery. 40% of eyes in the Artiflex group developed anterior chamber cell and flare reaction 1 year postoperatively, but no patient in the ICL group developed the same. So, there is obvious difference in the rate of anterior chamber cell and flare reaction between these two groups.

CONCLUSION: These two lenses have similar outcomes except in the incidence rate of anterior chamber cell and flare reaction that is greater in the Artiflex group. So, these two lenses are safe with predictable outcome in treating high myopia.

Keywords: Contrast sensitivity; intraocular pressure; myopia; phakic intraocular lens; specular microscopy; visual acuity

References

  1. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Mar;26(3):369-74 - PubMed
  2. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jun;22(2):130-2 - PubMed
  3. J Refract Surg. 2007 Nov;23(9):853-67 - PubMed
  4. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Mar;30(3):576-83 - PubMed
  5. Ophthalmology. 2009 Nov;116(11):2244-58 - PubMed
  6. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Mar;22(2):183-7 - PubMed
  7. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Jun;32(6):1007-10 - PubMed
  8. J Refract Corneal Surg. 1994 Sep-Oct;10(5):498-510 - PubMed
  9. J Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;25(9):765-70 - PubMed
  10. Ophthalmology. 2005 Dec;112(12):2189-95 - PubMed
  11. J Refract Surg. 1998 May-Jun;14(3):306-11 - PubMed
  12. Ophthalmology. 1998 Aug;105(8):1512-22, discussion 1522-3 - PubMed
  13. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Sep;33(9):1579-84 - PubMed
  14. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Aug;32(8):1388-91 - PubMed
  15. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Oct;22(8):1017-22 - PubMed
  16. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 May;33(5):784-90 - PubMed
  17. Ophthalmology. 2000 Apr;107(4):653-61 - PubMed
  18. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Sep;28(9):1589-93 - PubMed
  19. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 May;246(5):719-28 - PubMed
  20. Ophthalmology. 2009 Apr;116(4):671-7 - PubMed
  21. Ophthalmology. 1999 Sep;106(9):1651-5 - PubMed
  22. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Sep;32(9):1452-8 - PubMed

Publication Types