Display options
Share it on

Int J Angiol. 2008;17(2):78-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1278285.

A six-year study of diagnostic lower extremity imaging practice patterns and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs health care system.

The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc

Richard E Scranton, Ravi Dhingra, Elizabeth V Lawler, Kent Yucel, Amy Guo, Subha P Chittamooru, David R Gagnon, Joel W Hay, John M Gaziano

Affiliations

  1. Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Programs. [email protected]

PMID: 22477392 PMCID: PMC2728421 DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1278285

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of diagnostic imaging in the United States continues to increase, while investigations of the clinical implications following testing are lacking. The objectives of the present study are to describe the practice patterns and clinical outcomes that follow lower extremity diagnostic imaging. This is a retrospective cohort study with six years of data (1999 to 2004).

METHODS: The sources of data for the present study were Veterans Affairs Hospital administrative and clinical databases. The study population included 19,209 American veterans who had either contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the assessment of peripheral artery occlusive disease. Descriptive statistics of the characteristics were provided, as well as adjusted ORs for having interventions or complications following an imaging procedure.

RESULTS: The number of patients initially imaged with a contrast-enhanced MRA increased from 1999 to 2004, while those imaged with DSA decreased. The overall imaging rate remained relatively constant. In the multivariate model adjusted for the risk of complications within 30 days of the initial imaging procedure, the risk of complications following DSA increased 2.29-fold (95% CI 1.60 to 3.30). More patients had an intervention following DSA (DSA 41% versus MRA 23%, P<0.0001) but were also twice as likely to have an intervention with an amputation (adjusted OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.79 to 3.12).

CONCLUSIONS: The present study illustrates the need for prospective evaluation of diagnostic imaging to determine how best to employ screening strategies that will optimize diagnostic imaging and treatment in patients diagnosed with peripheral artery occlusive disease.

Keywords: Angiography; Diagnostic imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Peripheral artery occlusive disease; Peripheral vascular disease

References

  1. Am Heart J. 2005 Jul;150(1):35-40 - PubMed
  2. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Oct;179(4):1013-21 - PubMed
  3. Manag Care. 2005 Jan;14(1):22-4, 26, 28; passim - PubMed
  4. Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):934-9 - PubMed
  5. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Apr 28;163(8):884-92 - PubMed
  6. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 27;163(19):2306-14 - PubMed
  7. Diabetes Care. 2004 Jul;27(7):1591-7 - PubMed
  8. Radiology. 1992 Jan;182(1):243-6 - PubMed
  9. N Engl J Med. 1992 Feb 6;326(6):381-6 - PubMed
  10. JAMA. 2001 Sep 19;286(11):1317-24 - PubMed
  11. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(5):725-32 - PubMed
  12. JAMA. 2006 Feb 1;295(5):536-46 - PubMed
  13. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Sep;42(3):476-80 - PubMed
  14. JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):487-9 - PubMed
  15. Rev Prat. 1995 Jan 1;45(1):32-6 - PubMed

Publication Types