Display options
Cite
Lucassen P, van Rijswijk E, van Weel-Baumgarten E, et al. Making fewer depression diagnoses: beneficial for patients?. Ment Health Fam Med. 2008;5(3):161-5
Lucassen, P., van Rijswijk, E., van Weel-Baumgarten, E., & Dowrick, C. (2008). Making fewer depression diagnoses: beneficial for patients?. Mental health in family medicine, 5(3), 161-5.
Lucassen, Peter, et al. "Making fewer depression diagnoses: beneficial for patients?." Mental health in family medicine vol. 5,3 (2008): 161-5.
Lucassen P, van Rijswijk E, van Weel-Baumgarten E, Dowrick C. Making fewer depression diagnoses: beneficial for patients?. Ment Health Fam Med. 2008 Sep;5(3):161-5. PMID: 22477864; PMCID: PMC2777570.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Ment Health Fam Med. 2008 Sep;5(3):161-5.

Making fewer depression diagnoses: beneficial for patients?.

Mental health in family medicine

Peter Lucassen, Eric van Rijswijk, Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten, Christopher Dowrick

Affiliations

  1. Senior Researcher and General Practitioner.

PMID: 22477864 PMCID: PMC2777570

Abstract

Currently, general practitioners actively search for depressive disorders in their patients. When they diagnose 'depressive disorder', they tell their patients that they have a disease and can be treated accordingly. This is probably an important reason for the huge prescription rates of anti-depressants. In doing so, general practitioners implement specialised, psychiatric diagnostic methods in a setting characterised by patients with symptoms that superficially may resemble those of depressive disorder but in reality mainly arise from normal problems in everyday life due to losses of valued relations or failure to achieve desired goals. We argue that it might be beneficial for patients if general practitioners, in a stepped care approach, hold back on specialised methods of psychiatry and instead use a more generalist approach as first step, in which patients' problems are formulated in their own words, and efforts are directed in helping patients regain their self-confidence to solve them. Our arguments for directing attention away from diagnosing depressive disorder are: depressive disorder is a diagnosis by agreement and therefore relative, so there are other ways to look at problems than though psychiatric glasses; depression has unclear boundaries with other mental disorders and with normality; depression is often not an adequate summary of the real problems of the patient; the patient often has a very different conception about what is wrong and often does not agree with the proposed presence of a mental disorder; to diagnose depressive disorder may have more disadvantages than advantages for the patient;. the efficacy of anti-depressants is very modest.

References

  1. BMJ. 2007 Aug 18;335(7615):328 - PubMed
  2. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 17;358(3):252-60 - PubMed
  3. Chronic Illn. 2006 Jun;2(2):133-42 - PubMed
  4. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;191:206-11 - PubMed
  5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD003012 - PubMed
  6. BMJ. 2003 May 10;326(7397):1014 - PubMed
  7. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;164(10):1521-9; quiz 1622 - PubMed
  8. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;160(1):4-12 - PubMed
  9. BMJ. 2003 May 31;326(7400):1167-70 - PubMed
  10. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 May-Jun;26(3):184-9 - PubMed
  11. J Health Soc Behav. 1989 Mar;30(1):11-25; discussion 26-40 - PubMed
  12. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Jun 10;150(23):1275-7 - PubMed
  13. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 May 24;147(21):1005-9 - PubMed
  14. Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;184:470-6 - PubMed
  15. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21(2):146-51 - PubMed
  16. BMJ. 2005 Dec 17;331(7530):1462-4 - PubMed
  17. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;161(2):255-61 - PubMed
  18. Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Feb;155(2):172-7 - PubMed
  19. Aging Ment Health. 2007 May;11(3):291-300 - PubMed

Publication Types